Laserfiche WebLink
,ifike Boalav, DA1G <br />© October?1.1993 <br />Page a <br />2.) WHETHER MINING OPERATIONS WILL INTERRUPT, DISCONTINUE, <br />OR PRECLUDE FARMING OPERATIONS ON THE ALLUVIAL VALLEY <br />FLOORS; <br />Per page 16-3-6 of Attachment 16-3, the Yoasc mining and reclamation plans, as proposed, <br />will minimize disturbances to the hydrologic balance by preserving essential hydrologic <br />functions of the AVFs adjacen[ to the mining artd reclamation operations, including xhose <br />located in Sage Creek. That is, the mining :md reclamation operations will not interfere <br />with or impede the valley floor area's ability to collect, store, and regulate the natural flow <br />of surface water and groundwater. If anything, the quantities of water available to the <br />alluvial groundwater and surface water systems in the Sage Creek drainage have the potential <br />to increase following mining. <br />Per page 12 of Tab 16 and page 40 of Tab 17 (Probable Hydrologic Consequences), three <br />subirrigated hay fields were identified within the Sage Creek watershed. Two of the <br />subirrigated hay fields are located in Sections 30 and 19 of TSN, R87W, and are upstream of <br />all proposed mining disturbances associated with the Yoast Mine (see Exhibit 6-3, Sheet 2 of <br />2). The third subirrigated field is located in Section 18, TSN, R87W, approximately 1.5 <br />miles downstream from the mine and immediately above the failed Sage Creek Reservoir <br />dam. The field is used to produce grass hay. The minimal TDS increase predicted for the <br />Sage Creek alluvial flow system as a result of mining activities at the Yoast mine (less than <br />one percent or 1.0 mg/L) will have no appreciable impact on this subirrigated field. Because <br />available groundwater level data suggest that a majority of Sage Creek between the mine <br />permit boundary and the downstream subirrigated field is characterized as a gaining stream <br />reach (refer to Exhibit 7-2), surface water within the creek should have minimal contact with <br />groundwater in the subirrigated field. Therefore, TDS concentrations in the creek should <br />not impact groundwater concentrations in the alluvial groundwater system. Ground water <br />in the Sage Creek :illuviutn is currently unsuitable for domestic drinking water and is <br />marginally suitable for irrigation. Downgradient Sage Creek alluvial groundwater may be <br />chemically suitable for livestock, and the minimal, predicted increase in TDS will not <br />change this potential suitability. <br />3.) WHETHER MINING OPERATIONS WILL RESULT IN MATERIAL <br />DAMAGE TOTHE QUALITY OF SURFACE WATER SUPPLYING THE <br />ALLUVIAL VALLEY FLOORS; <br />As stated previously when addressing Stipulation No. 7, and as cited on pages 42 and 43 of <br />permit Tab 17, the cumulative predicted TDS concentration increase in Sage Creek surface <br />water from Yoast mining activities is relatively large (230 percent). The predicted <br />postmining TDS value at surface water station WSSF4, located approximately 1.3 miles <br />downstream of the mining boundary in Sage Creek, is 2118 mg/L. This TDS concentration <br />increase, although large in magnitude and long Germ, will resuh in minimal impacts. The <br />TDS increase will not significantly impact the potential use of this water for livestock <br />watering (the livestock TDS standard is 5,000 mg/L), domestic drinking water (the water <br />quality in Sage Creek at WSSF4 is currently unsuitable for drinking water), or irrigation <br />(sulfate and pH values at station WSSF4 are currently unsuitable for irrigation). The TDS <br />increase will also have no significance regarding flood irrigation at the historically flood- <br />