My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL38762
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL38762
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:58:25 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 9:49:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/9/1998
From
BLM
To
STEVE WOLCOTT
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIIIIIIIIIIII III <br />999 <br />United States Department of the Interior -:cLt)vEp <br />BUREAU OF LAND b1ANAGEh1ENT N~~ f) 9 1998 <br />UNCOMPAHGRE BASiN RESOURCE AREA ,is~cn ci Minerals & Geolo <br />2505 SOUTH TOWNSEND AVENUE 9Y <br />MON"I7tOSE, COLORADO 81401 <br />3400 <br />COC-37210 COC-27432 <br />COC-25079 COC-53356 <br />COD-036955 <br />CO-034 <br />Steve Walcott <br />P.O. Box 6 <br />Paonia, CO 81428 <br />Dear Mr. Wolcott: <br />NOV 2 1998 <br />We received your letters commenting on the Iron Point Tract and requesting information on the existing <br />Bowie #1 Mine coal leases. We want to assure you that the lease stipulations are being followed. The <br />leases including the special stipulations are attached. We couldn't find a requirement for water resource <br />"monitoring until ten years after the lease expires" in any of the special stipulations. The stipulations do <br />say the existing on-tract and cross-tract water flows will be maintained and as you suggest, the best way <br />to do this is to measure the water flows on a continual basis. This is being done and annual hydrologic <br />reports are submitted each year to the Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology (CDMG) as a part of <br />the Bowie #1 permit requirement for their mine plan (Permit C-81-038). We are in the process of getting <br />you copies of the monitoring data for the East Roatcap and West Roatcap drainages as requested. We <br />will send you the data in the near future. <br />Enclosed for your review is the water replacement plan and the sections in the CDMG mine plan which <br />address water (Hydrologic Appendices, Section 2.04.7, Section 2.05.6 etc.). There have been <br />Technical Revisions to the mine plan involving hydrology, that were available for public review as listed <br />in legal notices in the newspaper. In some cases, where mining had never occurred or was completed, <br />monitoring of water data may be reduced or stopped. <br />There is approximately 1000 feet of overburden between the springs in the Long Draw area and the <br />underlying coal. There is more overburden over the mined out area closest to the springs. See the <br />attached map for overburden contour lines and mined out areas in the East and West Roatcap Creek <br />drainages. The area above the mined out coal is about 1400 feet from the closest spring. Current <br />scientific data maintains that mining will not cause surface cracks when the overburden is 60 times the <br />mined height (60 X 14 feet = 840 feet), or in this case where the overburden is greater than 840 feet. <br />Using the scientific data, the area above the mined coal will not drain water into the mine and there will <br />be no loss of surface flows due to mining. In addition, using the 25° angle of draw and the overburden <br />of 1200 feet over the mined area, subsidence could affect up to 560 feet from the outside edge of the <br />mined area. Since the springs are 1400 feet from the outside edge of the mined area, the calculations <br />indicate the springs would not be affected. <br />Portions of East Roatcap Creek are protected by buffer zones. There was one entryway which <br />undermined the East Roatcap Creek buffer zone. The entryway was for development only; this means <br />that the pillars were not pulled and they were left in place to prevent surface subsidence in order to <br />ensure protection of water resources and riparian values. The safety factor of the pillars left in place is <br />enough to support the overburden. The attached map shows the areas under East Roatcap that were <br />undermined. In addition, in accordance with the lease stipulation 15 (D) of lease COC-37210, the water <br />in East Roatcap Creek was diverted to West Roatcap Creek via the Overland Ditch around the coal <br />lease and delivered to the original paints of use. The surface flow water in East Roatcap is being <br />monitored according to the water monitoring plan in the CDMG Permit. No mining has occurred under <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.