Laserfiche WebLink
Mid-Term Permit Review - 3 - March 25, 1986 <br />b. All changes in the original application must be reflected in the <br />text. These changes include: revisions, stipulation commitments, <br />operational or reclamation plans included in the application which <br />were never instituted, etc. All revised pages should include a <br />revision date in the bottom right hand corner. <br />c. In several areas material appears to be repeated, appendices are <br />inappropriately placed within the application, appendices and maps <br />are not properly referenced in the text, appendices are not properly <br />marked in the binders, etc. Specific instances of this will be <br />referenced in the following section, however the permittee should <br />review the document to be sure that proper formatting exists. <br />d. Addenda which have been added to the conclusion of permit sections, <br />such as in Section 2.04.6, should be incorporated into the body of <br />the section. <br />III. Specific Items Requiring Clarification or Updating. <br />This section follows the organizational format of the approved permit <br />application, and notes specific items which no longer reflect the <br />current status of the mining and reclamation plan. These items should <br />be revised as per Section II of this document. <br />Permit Application Form - The Division finds that several items in <br />the permit application form are no longer correct. <br />Specifically, this includes information on the current company <br />address, contact persons, and resident agent. The operator <br />should review this entire form and submit a new form reflecting <br />current information. Anew form has been included for your <br />convenience. <br />Section 2.03.3 - The portions of this section involving soils, <br />vegetation, and prime farmland should be cross referenced to <br />the proper sections in the permit, as was done with overburden. <br />Section 2.03.4 - a) The Division finds that this entire section needs <br />to be updated. Information pertaining to company officers, <br />permits held, etc. is no longer correct. References to the <br />Trout Creek No. 2 Mine should be deleted from the narrative <br />(this applies to the entire permit application). <br />b) There is a sentence in this section which indicates that the <br />Meadows No. 1 and Trout Creek No. 2 Mines are the same. This <br />should be deleted or clarified. <br />c> It appears that the legal description on the first page of <br />this section omits portions of the permit area, specifically <br />Sections 24, 25, 26, T6N, R87W. This description should be <br />amended as necessary. <br />