My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL37507
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL37507
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:57:36 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 9:12:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981041
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
12/10/1999
Doc Name
EMAIL SHRUB MEETING AND ROADSIDE
From
LARRY ROUTTEN
To
DAN MATTHEWS
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III II III III IIII III I .~ <br />999 <br />Mathews, Dan <br />From: Rourien, Lany <br />Sent: Friday, December 10, 1999 11:19 AM <br />To: Mathews, Dan <br />Subject: RE: shrub meeting and Roadside <br />I will look around a bit more for shrub data if I have time- I'll be on the raod most of next week. I think most of the <br />detailed shrub data I tried to lobby CMA with was from the Canadian Mine. I had some numbers from Trapper, too. I'll <br />take a look. <br />On Roadside- Sounds like your advice to PSC was in line with what we did at North Thompson Creek. With regard to the <br />shorter liability period for industrial areas, we told them the liability period ended when the new land use beaan. In that <br />case, we said it began when the scrapers started ripping up the land to build the golf course. The loadout had already <br />been reclaimed when the developers came along. So, any AVF reclamation requirements had already been done, <br />theoretically. However, we never looked at AVF issues when we changed the post-mine land use and did the bond <br />release. I am not sure what the implications of the AVF rules are for the Roadside situation where the reclamation is not <br />yet done. I'll look at that some other day if you want me to. Meanwhile, we can see what Lewicki comes up with. <br />-Original Message- <br />From: Mathews, Dan <br />SeM: Friday, December 10, 7999 11:02 AM <br />To: Routten, Larry <br />Subject: shrub meeting and Roadside <br />I'll plan to meet you at Sam friday moming and ride up together. In addition to anecdotes, what about those graphs <br />you had produced when you were trying to convince CMA of the wonders of non-parametric statistics? Didn't you <br />have shrub data for Colowyo, Trapper, and one of the Senecas? <br />On another subject, I met with an individual from Public Service Company yesterday moming and Elam Construction <br />Company yesterday ariemoon regarding possible land transfers involving various Roadside Mine facility areas. <br />Quaker Coal is apparently interested in getting rid of as much reclamation liability at Roadside as quickly as possible. <br />See the attached memo. <br />«File: meetings 12-9-99.doc» <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.