Laserfiche WebLink
Settling of the portal decline fill in the vicinity of the lower segment of the permanent channel has resulted <br />in a lowering of the original backfill contours, and creation of a shallow depression in the channel which <br />pools water when the channel flows. Over time, the depression will fill in with sediment, but in the interim <br />the settlement has resulted in the creation of a small wetland area, with no evident negative ramifications <br />to channel stability. Permit Exhibit 21 channel design specifies a steep channel segment (7.5%) and a <br />low gradient channel segment (2.5%) with design parameters for each segment. The original channel <br />construction was certified by Larry Reschke of Powderhorn Coal Company in 1995 (subsequent to the <br />settling), and a segment reconstructed in 2000 in association with Ute Water Line installation, was <br />certified by Jim Stover, P.E. consultant to SCC, in July, 2001. <br />Representative channel bottom widths of 35' and 38' were measured during a joint DMG/OSM inspection <br />in August 2001(Inspection Report dated 9/28/01), with representative depths of 34", 36" and 38" <br />(including berm height), and 22" and 27" (not including berm height). Required bottom width is 35', with <br />depth of 24". The low gradient channel segment of the Ute Water reconstruction reach was estimated <br />using an abney level to be approximately 5%. Jim Stover's surveyed grade for the segment was 3.2%. <br />Given the relative precision to be expected with an abney, the surveyed grade is considered reasonable. <br />This compares to design gradient of 2.5%. In his certification, Mr. Stover included a table relating flow <br />depth to velocity, showing that the design ramifications of the discrepancy between the design <br />specification and the surveyed gradient were insignificant. The high gradient segment of the channel, <br />immediately downstream from the Ute Water reconstruction reach, was estimated with the abney level to <br />be approximately 8%, which is comparable to the design specification of 7.5%. The channel has <br />functioned well since original construction in 1992, with no significant erosion and no instances of storm <br />flow escaping the channel. <br />During the field inspection in August 2001, it could not be discerned from visual observation whether the <br />upper segment of the North Decline permanent channel would meet design depth requirement of 24", <br />without reliance on existing channel berms for additional capacity. Measurements were taken using a <br />hand level and measuring tape at two locations where depth appeared questionable (if berms excluded). <br />Depths of 27" and 22" were recorded. The precision of the measurement is questionable, given the <br />uneven riprap channel bottom. Calculated flow depth for the design storm event and corresponding <br />channel gradient is 18" (Permit Appendix 13-2, p. NDEC-12). <br />Based on the August 2001 observations and measurements, the Division requested the operator to <br />modify the postmine topography map to specify modification or elimination of the berms adjacent to the <br />permanent channel. The reason for the request was to ensure that runoff from upland areas would be <br />able to enter the channel, following removal of temporary diversion and collection structures. The map <br />was properly modified to specify the installation of berm breaks. The Division further requested that the <br />operator submit an updated permanent channel P.E. construction certification, clarifying that the <br />permanent channel will contain the design flow without reliance on berms (to ensure the long term <br />functionality of the channel). An appropriate P.E. certification addendum dated 6/2/03 was prepared by <br />Jim Stover and submitted to the Division. The addendum certifies that the channel has adequate <br />capacity to pass the design flow with the required 6" of freeboard, without reliance on berms. <br />The North Decline reclaimed areas on either side of the channel are stable, and relatively flat, appear to <br />be similar to the original land form, and blend into the adjacent terrain, with no erosion evident. Based on <br />the documentation provided in the bond release application regarding the reclaimed configuration and <br />reconstructed channel, the referenced 2001 DMG channel measurements, and observations made during <br />the May 2003 bond release inspection, the Divisions finds that backfilling and grading operations have <br />been satisfactorily completed within the North Decline area. <br />2 West Portals <br />The amended 2-West Portals Map in the revised bond release application appropriately delineates the <br />"Graded, Seeded, and Mulched 2000" and "Graded, Seeded and Mulched 2001" areas which are subject <br />to the requested bond release. The two portals, and associated overburden stockpile site were reclaimed <br />in 2000; the compressor and substation facility, its associated overburden stockpile, and the overhead <br />Phase I Bond Release 1 ] August 15, 2003 <br />