GENERAL37090 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

by funds from other sources. The money to organize and plan the reclamation also had to be, raised from sources within the community. Nonetheless, the commitment from the Governor helped stimulate the community's effort. After the Commission completed its work in 1990, wntinued movement toward resolving the issue did not come easily. Castle Concrete, the City of Colorado Springs, the El Paso County Commissioners and the citizens had different views regarding enhanced reclamation and how the responsibility for doing the reclamation should be allocated. At one point in 1990 the city and county goverments considered boycotting Castle Concrete to force the company to do more than the legally required reclamation. The boycott did not come about and eventually representatives from the company and leaders in the community created a mechanism to manage the issue. The mechanism was the development of the joint city and county "Charter for Additional Reclamation at Castle Concrete Company Quarries" and the creation of the El Paso County/Colorado Springs Mining Rechunation Advisory Committee (MRAC). The charter articulated the goals for enhanced reclamation and the procedures to be used to achieve them. MRAC was given the responsibility to carry out the charter. MRAC included citizens from the community appointed by the city and county and representatives. from Castle Concrete. The chairman of MRAC and a representative of the Castle Concrete Company signed the charter along with the mayor of Colorado Springs and the Chairran of the El Paso County Commissioners. Although not a signatory to the charter, the Colorado Department of Natural Resources agreed to provide support and to monitor progress for the governor. The charter duetted parties to the agreement to pursue a solution to the problem by fast fostering "a climate of cooperation." The charter set forth a procedure to accomplish the goal and stated that MRAC should accomplish the following: 1. Refine post reclamation land use(s) sensitive to visual compatibility concerns. 2. Develop engineering and site-specific designs for additional reclamation at the Pikeview, Queens Canyon and Snyder quarries; 3. Prepare cost estimates for all additional reclamation measures; 4. Set forth a proposed timetable for implementation; 5. Set forth the procedure for Castle Concrete Company to submit enhanced reclamation proposals as technical revisions under the Mined Land Reclamation Act; and 6. Develop a strategy for funding the additional reclamation costs from commercial, public, private and non-profit sources, and develop a process for contracting additional rechunation. The charter included a set of enhanced reclamation concepts for each quarry. The committee was to use the Report of the Commission on Mountain Scarring, the experience of Castle Concrete, the advice of the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Division, and the experience and expertise of the members of the committee to guide them in the development of the enhanced reclamation plans. MRAC met regulazly for two years. The meetings educated people about the history of the quarries, the role that Queens Canyon Quarry plays as Bighorn Sheep habitat, and the technical aspects of reclamation -that is, what could realistically be achieved. Members of the committee (5)