My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL36970
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL36970
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:57:17 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:56:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
10/21/1996
Doc Name
GOLDEN EAGLE RECLAMATION C-81-013
From
WESTERN ENERGY CO
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
RECLAMATION PROJECTS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii iuiiiiiniu iii <br />999 <br />WESTERN ENERGY COMPANY <br />P.O. BOX 99 / COLSTRIP, MONTANA69323 / (406) 748-5100 <br />October 17, 1996 ~EC~V=iVLL~ <br />Mr. Kent Gorham oe7 ` 1 1996 <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />State of Colorado <br />Division of Minerals and Geology (~ivisiori o. +.~: ~eraia a ~c:,~.,:~~ <br />1313 Sherman Street Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />SUBJECT: Golden Eagle Reclamation, #C-81-013 <br />Deaz Kent: <br />Upon reciept of your letter dated October 7, 1996, I reviewed the Proposed post-mining <br />topography and reclamation cross sections of the proposed post-mining topography. I found two <br />errors. The first is on the Proposed post-mining topography plan. The contour 7150 should have <br />been drawn to intersect the cross section B-B' at approximately 2,500 feet. Moving the toe of <br />this slope out to this point would allow the final slope to closely approximate the approved final <br />topography while being somewhat flatter that the original contours (please reference the CF&1 <br />Steel Corporation Proposed Surface Layout plan enclosed in my letter of October 8, 1996). A <br />revised post-mining topography is enclosed. The second error is the plotting of cross section B- <br />B'. The existing and proposed lines shown on the September 20 submittal are approximately 10 <br />feet high behveen 2300 feet and 2400 feet. A revised Reclamation cross sections of the post- <br />mining topography is enclosed. <br />The explanation for modif}~ing the topography at 1880 feet on the B-B' cross section is to t7atten <br />the outslope of the road embankment dozing the material downhill rather than filling it from <br />below. Upon completion of the slope reduction the road would be reestablished. <br />Regarding your questions on the re-application of topsoil Basin provides the following <br />information: <br />1. At the time of the September 20 submittal it appeared that Stroud Oil was interested in <br />obtaining Pond 5. Since that time they have decided to not pursue this option. Basin plans to <br />utilize TS4 to reclaim Pond 5. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.