My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL36874
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL36874
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:57:14 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:54:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1983059
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
7/23/1993
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION & FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE FOR RN2
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ivers under study for designation, and National Recreation Areas <br />(2.07.6 (2) (d) (iii) (A)) ; <br />d) Three hundred feet of any public building, school, church, community <br />or institutional building, or public park (2.07.6 (2)(d)(iii)(8)); <br />e) One hundred feet of a cemetery (2 .07.6(2)(d)(iii)(C)); <br />f) The boundaries of any National Forest (2 .07.6 (2)(d)(iii)(D)); <br />g) One hundred feet of the outside right-of-way line of any public road <br />except where the mine access or haul roads join such line, and <br />excepting any roads for which the necessary approvals have been <br />received, notices published, public hearing opportunities provided, <br />and written findings made (2 .07.6(2)(d)liv)); <br />The haul/access road for the loadout joins State Highway 133. <br />h) Three hundred feet of an occupied dwelling unless a written waiver <br />from the owner has been provided (2 .07.6(2)(d)(v)). <br />8xhibit 12 of the permit application contains a letter from a <br />resident south of the loadout consenting to operations within 300 <br />feet of his dwelling. <br />On the basis of information submitted by Terror Creek Company in the form <br />of a letter from the State Historic Preservation Officer with the Colorado <br />Historical Society, the Division finds that subject to valid existing <br />rights ae of August 3, 1977, the mining operation will not adversely <br />affect any publicly owned park or place listed on the National Register of <br />Historic Places (2.07.6(2)(e)(i)). <br />For this operation, private mineral estate has not been severed from <br />private surface estate; therefore, the documentation specified by Rule <br />2.03.6(2) is not required (2.07.6(2)(f)). <br />On the basis of evidence submitted by the applicant and received from <br />other state and federal agencies as a result of the Section 34-33-114(3) <br />compliance review required by the Colorado Surface Coal Mining Reclamation <br />Act, the Division finds that Terror Creek Company does not own or control <br />any operations which are currently in violation of any law, rule, or <br />regulation of the IInited States, or any State law, rule, or regulation, or <br />any provision of the Surface Mining Control and~Reclamation Act or the <br />Colorado Surface Coal Mining Reclamation Act (2.07.6(2)(g)(i)). <br />Terror Creek Company does not control and has not controlled mining <br />operations with a demonstrated pattern of willful violations of the Act of <br />such nature, duration, and with such resulting irreparable damage to the <br />environment as to indicate an intent not to comply with the provisions of <br />the Act (2.07.6(2)(h)). <br />The Division finds that surface coal mining and reclamation operations to <br />be performed under this permit will not be inconsistent with other such <br />operations anticipated to be performed in areas adjacent to the permit <br />area (2.07.6(2)(1)). <br />10. The Division has examined and ie holding a certificate of deposit from the <br />Citizens Fidelity Bank and Trust in the amount of $96,550.95. This bond <br />has received final approval. The reclamation bond is currently being <br />reviewed pursuant to Rule 3.02.2(4) to determine whether the above bond <br />amount reflects the Division's projection of reclamation costs for <br />worst-case disturbance which will occur during the proposed permit term <br />(2.07.6. (2) (j)) . <br />Terror Creek I,aadout Page 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.