Laserfiche WebLink
iii iiiiiiiiiiiii iii <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />OF CO <br /> <br />Department of Natural Resources O <br />tiW,i~.~\q~ <br />^ <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br /> <br />CO <br />3 <br />~e ' <br />' ~~ <br />~ "~~~~ <br />Denver. <br />8020 ~ ~" <br />~ <br />303 866-3567 - <br />. <br />~/Rl6 <br />FA%:303 832-8106 <br /> Roy Romei. <br /> Governor <br /> <br />DATE: December 26, 1989 Dvs onD actor <br />T0: Carl Mount <br />FROM: Tom Gi 11 i s ,`0~ <br />RE: Peabody Coal Equipment Cost Estimating Methodology <br />I have completed a review of Peabody's proposed method of estimating equipment <br />ownership costs for multiple shift work using Cost Reference Guide (CRG) base <br />data and utilizing doubled annual use hour values to reduce hourly <br />depreciation, overhead, and cost of facilities capital (CFC). This proposed <br />method, and the Division's nethod, were discussed and compared in detail with <br />Mr. Thomas Curl of Dataquest. Mr. Curl in turn met with Bill Woodall and <br />Don Hopkins of Dataquest to determine the most appropriate method of using the <br />CRG to estimate equipment ownership costs for independent earthwork <br />contractors and not large scale mining operations. It was the conclusion of <br />Dataquest personnel that the Division's existing method of using CRG base <br />values and adjustments based on empirical independent contractor averages is a <br />more appropriate method than that proposed by Peabody. As such, the Division <br />cannot accept the hourly equipment costs proposed by Peabody. The minimum <br />acceptable equipment costs remain those previously forr.~arded to Peabody by the <br />Division. <br />_,~ <br />The Division's method of using CRG cost data consists of evaluating in <br />sequence the full range of adjustments available in Section 23 of the CRG, <br />"Cost and Production Formulas". For each cost element listed, the Division <br />compares the base value of each cost factor pertaining to that cost element <br />with average independent contractor cost factor values obtained from annual <br />survey data of Associated General Contractor (AGC) members. This survey data <br />is compiled by Dataquest and published in the Contractor's Equipment Cost <br />Guide (CECG). The Division's adjustment for multiple shift work is made as <br />specified in Section 23.VII of the CRG. Personnel from Dataquest did not feel <br />that doubling CRG base annual use hours to produce a 0.5 adjustment factor for <br />equipment depreciation and overhead was an appropriate method of adjusting <br />ownership costs for multiple shift work, especially within the context of an <br />independent contractor equipment ownership scenario where very little or no <br />multiple shift work is done over the economic life of the equipmen] It has <br />been the Division's direct experience in over 200 contracted reclamation <br />projects completed in the last 7 years that independent contractors rarely, if <br />ever do work on a 2 or 3 shift per day basis. Without exception, all of the <br />jobs contracted by the Division since it's inception have been done on a <br />single shift basis, and this work has included several large surface mine <br />earthwork projects. <br />