Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br />Affidavit, such a disruption could severely harm CF&I Steel's <br />business. <br />C. CFSI Steel Has Met the Requirements of 11 U.S.C. <br />§ 365(b)(1)(A), (B) and (C). <br />In accordance with the requirements set forth in section <br />365(b)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code, CF&I Steel is prepared to (1) <br />cure or provide adequate assurance of prompt cure of all defaults <br />under all the Agreement, (2) pay or provide adequate assurance of <br />payment of any and all actual pecuniary loss suffered by Coastal, <br />and (3) provide Coastal with adequate assurance of future <br />performance in accordance with the provisions of the Agreement. <br />The "default" under the Agreement arises by operation of <br />federal bankruptcy law which prohibits CF&I Steel from pa}~ing <br />certain amounts which arose prepetition without court approval. <br />CF&I Steel, in the Motion, has made a proposal to cure this <br />default amount by payment over time. This payment will fully <br />compensate Coastal for all actual pecuniary loss resulting from <br />CF&I Steel's default. <br />Cf&I Steel has also alleged in the Motion that its credit <br />line and income constitute adequate assurance of its future <br />performance under the Agreement. Richmond Leasing Co. V. Capital <br />Bark, 762 F.2d 1303 (5th Cir. 1985) (debtor corporation's <br />profitability is important factor in determining adequate <br />assurance of future performance). <br />Furthermore, after assumption of the Agreement by CF•5I, any <br />claim that arises under the Agreement becomes an administrative <br />priority. The credit line, cash flow, income, and asset 'oase of <br />4 <br />