My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL36809
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL36809
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:57:12 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:53:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977376
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Name
MEMO IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ORDER APPROVING ASSUMPTION OF EXECUTORY CONTRACT WITH COASTAL GAS MARK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />The business judgment test essentially requires the debtor <br />to prove that the assumption or rejection of a contract will <br />benefit the estate; bankruptcy courts will defer to the debtor's <br />sound business judgment in making that decision. in re Constant <br />Care Community Health Center. Inc., 99 Bankr. 697 (Bankr. D. Md. <br />1989) (in determining whether to permit debtor to reject <br />executory contract, bankruptcy court defers to debtor's sound <br />business judgment); In re Leibinaer-Roberts. Inc., 105 Bankr. 208 <br />(Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 1989) (business judgment test requires <br />demonstration that assumption or rejection of contract will <br />benefit the estate). <br />In CF&I's business judgment, assumption of the Agreement is <br />in the best interests of CF&I Steel's creditors and its estate. <br />The affidavit of Earl Emery, filed herewith, sets forth the <br />essential nature of a supply of natural gas for CF&I's business. <br />Furthermore, the affidavit represents that there are no <br />alternative sources of natural gas which could be obtained at a <br />comparable price or under comparable terms and conditions to the <br />gas provided under the Agreement as modified by agreement of the <br />parties. <br />Finally, an order of the Court required CF&I Steel to file a <br />motion to assume or reject the Agreement by January 31, 1991. <br />CF&I believes that assumption of the Agreement is the only <br />economically feasible alternative. A rejection of the Agreement <br />may disrupt CF&I Steel's gas supply. As disclosed in the <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.