My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL36693
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL36693
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:57:08 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:50:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
7/28/1992
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION & FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE FOR RN2
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />of four sediment ponds constructed below the loadout facilities <br />serve to maintain water quality at disturbances in this drainage. <br />Monitoring data collected during the past five years support this <br />conclusion. <br />Water Quantity Effects <br />The quantity of water in the Trout Creek basin will not be <br />increased or decreased as a result of mining. A small change in <br />the partitioning of total runoff into surface and subsurface <br />components is the only anticipated effect of mining on the overall <br />water balance. Prior to mining, the ratio was 7 percent surface <br />runoff to 93 percent subsurface runoff. During mining, the <br />predicted ratio changes to 4 percent surface flow and 96 percent <br />subsurface flow. <br />The post-mining landscape of the Moffat Area will be regraded and <br />topsoiled to the same general topography as currently exists. It <br />is expected that the mean slope and infiltration capacity of the <br />area will eventually be very similar to the pre-mining conditions. <br />An increased potential maximum ground water retention is expected, <br />but not of the magnitude that will significantly affect the surface <br />water balance over time. Therefore, about the same partitioning <br />into overland runoff and infiltration is expected to occur in the <br />post-mining phase as now exists. <br />Between the time that mining occurs and the time that full <br />revegetation has been accomplished, evapotranspiration may be <br />reduced relative to current water consumption by vegetation. A <br />corresponding increase in subsurface runoff will occur. <br />Reclamation activities will eventually establish a plant cover with <br />a water demand very similar to that which now exists. Possibly the <br />most significant factor that could substantially affect the <br />post-mining water balance is a change in the effective rooting <br />depth and the total available water-holding capacity of the root <br />zone. Again, such a change is difficult to accurately predict. <br />The interface between the topsoil and the spoil may serve to reduce <br />downward movement of water and cause the available water-holding <br />capacity to be greater than in the undisturbed state. <br />Changes in evapotranspiration and the partitioning of runoff into <br />surface and subsurface components due to the factors discussed <br />above are expected to be small. Therefore, the post-mining water <br />balance is estimated to be virtually unchanged from that which now <br />exists. <br />Water Quality Effects <br />The primary impact from mining on surface water quality at the Edna <br />Mine was identified as potential salt loading of Trout Creek. <br />Increased concentrations of total dissolved solids CTDS) in the <br />stream were expected, based upon mass-balance calculations <br />presented in the application. <br />_~~_ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.