My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL35773
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL35773
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:56:36 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:26:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981039
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
9/19/1984
Doc Name
Final Draft Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-38- <br />Wildlife information in the application is based on regional habitat mapping <br />done by the Division of Wildlife. No site specific data or observations are <br />contained in the application. The regional mapping designates the permit area <br />as being within critical winter range areas for mule deer and elk and within a <br />migration corridor for elk. It is probable that some elk calving occurs in <br />aspen vegetation types on the permit area. <br />In order to maximize the forage production for livestock the surface <br />landowner, Bogle Farms, has requested that shrubs and trees not be planted on <br />reclaimed areas. Conversion from an aspen-shrub vegetation type to a grass <br />forb type at Grassy Gap would not be expected to negatively impact deer or elk <br />populations for two reasons. First, though the regional maps designate the <br />site as critical winter range, snow depth during heavy winters precludes deer <br />and elk use at the elevation of the mine pits (7,500-8,000 feet). Second, the <br />total disturbance at Grassy Gap is less than 350 acres, and the area will be <br />totally reclaimed within 5 years. The largest contiguous disturbance is the <br />Pit 4 area, approximately 137 acres. The proposed reclamation should result <br />in very favorable spring, summer, and fall habitat for elk. With the <br />exception of the Pit 4 area, all of the reclaimed pit areas will be less than <br />1,200 feet wide. Based on available literature, such forage areas would be <br />expected to be fully utilized by elk. <br />As a result of the low potential for negative wildlife impact, habitat <br />mitigation other than a 30 mph haulroad speed limit will not be required. <br />However, if the mining area is expanded in the future, mitigation such as <br />off-site vegetation manipulation could be warranted. <br />Pursuant to Rule 2.07.6(2)(n), and on the basis of available information, the <br />Division finds that the proposed activities will not affect the continued <br />existence of threatened or endangered species or result in the destruction or <br />adverse modification of their critical habitats. <br />The operation is in compliance with the requirements of this section. <br />XI V. Prime Farmland - Rules 2.04.12, 2.06.6 and 4.25 <br />Pursuant to Rule 2.07.6(2)(k), the Division has made a negative prime farmland <br />determination. The determination is based on a letter from John Valentine, <br />SCS District Conservationist, which states that Routt County does not have any <br />prime farmland soils. <br />XV. Operation Description - Rules 2.05.2, 2.05.3(1), 2.05.3(2) and 4.01 <br />The mine operations plan is contained on pages III-1 through III-29 of the <br />application. To date, coal extraction, backfilling, topsoiling and seeding <br />have been completed at Pits 1, 2, 3 and 5 as approved in Permit 78-45 issued <br />by the Mined Land Reclamation Board in 1978. All of the disturbance areas <br />were 30 acres or less. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.