My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL35773
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL35773
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:56:36 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:26:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981039
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
9/19/1984
Doc Name
Final Draft Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-16- <br />Alluvial Valley Floor Findings <br />Pursuant to Rules 2.06.8 and 4.24.2 the Division is required to make specific <br />written findings on the effect of mining on all AVF's within the permit and <br />adjacent area. The required findings are presented below. <br />1. Pursuant to Rule 2.06.8(5)(a)(i)(A)(I), the Division finds that: The <br />proposed mining operations would not interrupt, discontinue, or <br />preclude farming on an alluvial valley floor, unless the pre-mining <br />land use has been undeveloped rangeland which is not significant to <br />farming on the alluvial valley floor. <br />The reason for the positive AVF determination is the apparent <br />potential for flood irrigation of the 20 acre body of alluvium. <br />Presently, the AVF is undeveloped rangeland which is not significant <br />to farming. The AVF will not be directly impacted by the mining <br />operations. <br />2. Pursuant to Rule 2.06.8(5)(a)(i)(A)(II), the Division finds that the <br />proposed mining operation would not materially damage the quantity or <br />quality of surface and ground water which supply the alluvial valley <br />floor. <br />In the early years following reclamation, there may be some increase <br />in the amount of water supplied to Grassy Creek, due to the <br />conversion of aspen and mountain shrub vegetation types to grassland, <br />and the resulting reduction in transpiration loss. The effects would <br />be relatively short-term, as over a period of years, woody species <br />would be expected to reestablish on the reclaimed areas. Due to the <br />limited area affected by mining and the fact that no regional bedrock <br />aquifers will be disturbed, the quantity impacts on Grassy Creek are <br />not expected to be detectable. <br />There is a potential for some degradation of Grassy Creek alluvial <br />and surface waters due to leaching of salts as a water table develops <br />in the reclaimed pits and discharges as springs or seeps to Grassy <br />Creek. The projected water quality of Grassy Creek resulting from <br />mining activities is not expected to degrade to a point whereby the <br />useability of the surface water for irrigation would be affected (see <br />discussion in Section IX, Probable H drolo is Copse uences and <br />Cumulative Hvdrolooic Impact Studv of this document . <br />3. Pursuant to Rule 4.24.2(1) and (2), the Division finds that the <br />essential hydrologic functions of the alluvial valley floor would be <br />preserved. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.