My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL35404
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL35404
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:56:24 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:19:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/1/1992
Doc Name
Stip 32 letter
Permit Index Doc Type
STIPULATIONS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~, • / I\I III III III IIII III <br />Y I ,~ <br />i <br />Ms. Welt ~~!! 'nn ~b(~ Q <br />Page 4. '~t~ Y" l (/~ ~. ~( I L <br />II . Surface Hydrology b d~~u ~ ~~ l G i; ~~/ <br />1. Upon review of MCC's reorganized permit document and a field <br />inspection conducted on May 5, 1992, a berm was found in place at <br />the Sylvester Gulch Fan site. <br />PART II: ADDITIONAL ADEOQACY COMMENT <br />1. MCC should update the Spill Prevention Containment and <br />Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan contained as Exhibit 8 in Volume 2, to <br />represent current conditions at the West Elk Mine. <br />2. Exhibit 51 in Volume 10, Lower Refuse Pile, should be revised <br />to show the new configuration of the waste pile. Also the <br />reclamation plan should be updated to include the approved <br />technical revision for the variance of cover on the refuse pile. <br />3. Please submit a statement to be inserted into the permit <br />document that clarifies the Freshwater Pond (FW-2), is not planned <br />for this permit term. <br />4. According to Page 2.05-38 of the permit document, MCC will <br />reclaim the Bear #1 area according to Bear Coal Company's <br />reclamation plan. This reclamation plan should be included with <br />MCC's permit. <br />5. Please provide the Division with as-built designs for sediment <br />ponds, freshwater pond, and ditches. <br />6. A general statement should be contained in MCC's permit stating <br />how sediment will be controlled at drill sites contained within <br />MCC's permit area. ~7 C `/ , <br />SAC I.~OY1 7~~ Ma 3~ '~31 .~ G'lI -/~ <br />PART III: STIPIILATIONS ~~ rS~~ YI~ ~ '(/I (S~~/ <br />Grr rY,a{,c ~~~5 wGa~ ~~,v,~.. W~la~ w~((S . II ~,l/~ <br />c~ ~1 r3~ C~~~ ~~~ ~n i ~c,c~. <br />~1.. Stipulation 32 (Stipulation 7 rom Permit Revision 2 and 4), <br />concerning monitoring two wells located over the first panel to be <br />subsided one year prior to mining this panel, currently has a <br />r, status of complied with. There is a note from a previous lead <br />( reclamation specialist that states the Division accepts MCC's <br />response. What was included in the MCC response and when was it <br />sent? The Division requests MCC//'slIassistance to reconcile this <br />stipulation. C~C(+.i~l{, CrU 'Su.b.i~dcN( C.~ (!(C4V1r ~pv"~ v1 1 ~~~Gu~C'~~~u,) <br />2. Stipulation 4 from the 1986 Permit Renewal states, "When the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.