My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-03-19_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1980004
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1980004
>
2004-03-19_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1980004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/19/2020 3:14:38 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:10:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980004
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
3/19/2004
Doc Name
Midterm Review Findings Document
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Permit Transfers <br />SO-2 Permit Transfer application was submitted by GVCC on May 27, 1999. The successor <br />operator/permittee was Lodestar Energy, Inc. (LEI). The Divisions approval decision became final <br />August 17, 1999. <br />SO-3 Permit Transfer application was submitted by LEI on June 26, 2003. The successor <br />operator/pemuttee was Central Appalachia Mining, LLC, (CAM). The Division deemed the <br />application complete and issued a preliminary adequacy letter to CAM on July 3, 2003. Following <br />submittal of responses by CAM, and one additional adequacy letter/response submittal sequence, all <br />issues except right of entry had been adequately resolved. The Division stated in a letter of January 9, <br />2004, that because BLM bad not yet approved federal coal lease transfers from LEI to CAM, legal right <br />of entry had not been documented and thus the Division could not recommend approval. of the pemut <br />transfer to CAM. The status of the pernut transfer has not changed to date (March 2004), because <br />BLM has not been able to approve the lease transfer. CAM officials have indicated that progress is <br />being made, and that LEDs banlauptcy trustee has begun entering delinquent production data into the <br />Minerals Management Service (MMS) intemet based reporting system, which will need to be <br />completed before MMS can assess the amount of delinquent payments, and advise BLM of resolution, <br />Bond Adjustments <br />SI-1 Bond Adjustment was approved by the Division on June 29, 2001. The bond adjustment was <br />based on the Division's reclamation cost estimate associated with review of the RN-OS pemut renewal <br />application. The reclamation liability amount prior to SI-1 was $192,537.00, and the Division held a <br />cash bond in that amount. The adjusted liability amount estimated by the Division, and set forth in SI- <br />1, was $271,563.00, The updated liability estimate included revised equipment costs, and new or <br />amended costs for various reclamation tasks. LEI submitted a new cash bond (Bond No. 158930402) <br />in the amount of $79,026.00 on July 12, 2001. The Division accepted the new bond on July 20, 2001. <br />SI-1 Bond Adjustment brought the total bond amount held by the Division to $271,563.00, in the form <br />of two separate cash bonds. This amount con•esponded exactly with the calculated liability amount. <br />Technical Revisions <br />TR-9 proposed approval decision was issued July 16, 1999. The revision provided information <br />required by various stipulations that had been attached to the renewal permit issued in July 1997. In <br />conjunction with TR-9 and the 1999 Mid-term Pemut Review, the reclamation liability amount was <br />increased from $161,147.00 to $190,037.00, and surety bond in that amount was submitted: <br />TR-10 proposed approval decision was issued January 18, 2000. The revision submitted by LEI set <br />forth a number of operational amendments associated with anticipated resumption of coal production <br />at the mine. Changes included revised screening and crushing facilities, amended mine plan map, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.