My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL35061
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL35061
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:56:13 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:09:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
8/15/1984
Doc Name
RESPONSE TO PROBLEMS 84-012-04 AND 84-012-07 FOR THE NEW ELK MINE PROBLEMS 84-013-01 AND 84-013-03
From
WYOMING FUEL CO
To
SUSAN MOWRY
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />999 <br />Wyoming !~uel Compony <br />12055 W. Second Place • P.O.Box15596 • Lakewood, Colorado 80215 • Telephone (303)989-5037 <br />August 15, 1984 RECEIVED <br />AU G 151984 <br />Ms. Susan Mowry <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />Colo. Dept of Natural Resources <br />Re: Response to Problems 84-012-04 and 84-012-07 for the New Elk Mine, Problems <br />84-013-01 and 84-013-03 for the Golden Eagle Mine Identified in Jim Herron's <br />April 24, 1984 Inspection Report <br />Dear Ms. Mowry: <br />By this letter Wyoming Fuel Company (WFC) is responding to the above stated <br />problems. The following responses are based on preliminary evaluations and the meeting <br />held on August 7, 1984 with you, Jim Herron and myself. <br />New Elk Mine <br />Problem 84-012-04. An analyses of culvert sizing can be found in Appendix A. The <br />basic approach was to determine if the design flow capacity could be met by using <br />available head (difference in top of road or top of rail elevation to bottom of inlet). <br />With the exception of CMP 2 all installed culverts in question will handle design <br />flows without overtopping. <br />The design flow for CMP 2 is 104.57 cfs. The existing culvert (36 inch CMP) will <br />handle 70 cfs. WFC will bring this into compliance by constructing an Arizona <br />crossing or improving the inlet. Construction details will be submitted as a minor <br />revision. Since the runoff season is coming to a close I feel there is no need to do <br />this work during 1984. WFC will commit to submitting the minor revision by the end <br />of February 1985 and complete construction by April 15, 1985. <br />Problem 84_012-07. Appendix B contains survey information for ponds 004, 005, 006 <br />and 007. During the April 24, 1984 inspection, pond 007 was dewatering at a lower <br />elevation than the maximum sediment storage volume, which under current CMLRB <br />policy is 100%. This indicates the slots in the principal riser are below the <br />maximum sediment level. The survey shows the principals have sufficient Height <br />with minor pond cleaning to handle the 100% sediment level plus a !0 year 24 hour <br />storm event. WFC plans to modify the principals as necessary to meet section <br />405.6(3)(c) of the CMLRB regulations. WFC will commit to this by April 15, 1985. <br />The relative elevations presented in Appendix B shows the emergency spillways will <br />handle design flow depths presented in the application with 1 foot of freeboard. Tn <br />addition, based on elevations differences between the top of the principal and <br />bottom of the emergency no discharge should occur during the 10 year 24 hour storm <br />event. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.