Laserfiche WebLink
The surface erne operations proposed and he application have <br />been d ed co prevent damage to the ~logi~ balance in <br />assoeial~(i o?f-site areas. (2.07.6(3), i86.19(t); (see page 16-19 <br />of C:S.3D's decision documene). <br />;. After revYeving the description of the proposed permit area, CMLB.D and <br />OSM deteaaiae shin area is: <br />a. Not included vithia as area designated unsuitable for surface coal <br />mining operations. (2.07,6(2)(3)(1); 786.19(d)(i); (see HL~l's <br />letter dated August 25, 1982 Secluded in the Notification section). <br />b. Not vithia an area under study for designating lands unsuitable for <br />surface coal mining operations. (2.07.6(2)(d)(ii); 786.19(3)(2). <br />c. Not on any loads subject to the prohibitions or limieatioas of 30 <br />CFR 761.11(a) (natlanal parks, etc.), 761.11(f) (public buildings, <br />etc.), and 761.11(g) (cemeteries). (2.07.6(2)(3); 786.19(3)(3); <br />(see Technical Analysis). <br />3. The applicant proposes to continue surface coal mining operations <br />at the Roadside `line vithia 100 £eet of the outside right-oi-vay of <br />Interstate 70. Because the mine vas 1n existence prior to august <br />3, S 77, it is ezempted from the prohibition on mining operations <br />vithia 100 feet of the outside right-of-way of any public roads. <br />No mining operations are proposed for the Cameo :line vichia '_00 <br />feet of the outside right-of-vay of a public road. (2.07,6(2)(3), <br />786.19(3)(4); (see page 34 of CMLBD's decision documenC). <br />e. Not vithia 300 feet of any occupied dvelliag. (2.07.6(2)(d)(v), <br />786.19(3)(5) <br />4. OSM's issuance of a pewit and the Secretarial decision on the !iineral <br />l,eaeing Act plan are in compliance with the National Historic <br />Preservation Act and implementing regulations (36 CFR 800). <br />(2.07,6(2)(e), 786.19(e); (see page 9 of C`.'1.3D's decision document; <br />State Historic Preservation Officer concurrence letter). <br />5. The applicant has the legal right to eater and begin surface mining <br />activi ties is the permit arse. 786.19(f); (see page 7, Volume I of <br />she MRP dated January 1982-Pavderhorn Coal Company). <br />6. The applicant has submitted proof sad OSM's records indicate chat <br />p Y or violations of appL'cable law and :egulatioas gave been corrected <br />vlth two eaceptions. On November 10, 1982, the Roadslde/Cameo Mines <br />received Notices of Violation numbered 8249 and 8251 from the C:II.SD. <br />Violation Number 8249 related to failure to minimize damage to the <br />hydrologic system because of coal processing wastes on mine roads. <br />Violation Number 8251 related to failure cc salvage topsoil on the <br />Cameo Aaste Zile '_n that waste vas dumped on topsoil and vegetation. <br />At the time of issuance, the State s?eci=fed ^_hat the violations were <br />to be abated by December 21, =982, At the present time, the State is <br />considering emending the deadL'ne for abatement beyond the Holidays <br />due to the curtailed staff at the sine. ?tie CMLRD is aonitoriag the <br />abatements and is satisf fed that the violations are in the process of <br />befog corrected. (2.07.6(2)(8), i86.19~;); (Personal communications <br />with Jim derron, Reclamation Soecaiiist with C.`ZRD on December 10, <br />1982 and Des: Zingo, OSM Reclamation SpeciaL'st, Albuquerque ?ie'_d <br />Office on December 9, 1982). <br />