Laserfiche WebLink
Block 5 <br />The erosion condition composite SSF score for this site was 6, which placed it in the <br />Stable erosion class. The tabulated results for this survey aze shown in Table 6. Several gullies <br />in this block were repaired in 1995. Although a few gullies were noted in the bottom one third of <br />the block, all are inactive and have vegetation establishing on the sides and bottoms. No <br />corrective measures are planned as a result of the inventory. <br />Table 6: Moffat Area Block 5 Erosion Condition Classification <br />Possible <br />Item Score 1998 1997 1996 1995 1993 <br />Soil Movement 14 0 3 3 5 3 <br />Surface Litter 14 0 3 0 3 0 <br />Surface Rock Fragments 14 0 0 2 0 0 <br />Pedestalling 14 0 0 0 0 0 <br />Flow Pattems IS 0 0 3 9 3 <br />Rills 14 3 3 5 9 0 <br />Gullies IS 3 0 8 6 0 <br />Total 100 6 9 21 32 6 <br />Erosion Condition Classification: Stable Stable Slight Slight Stable <br />• Block 6 <br />The erosion condition composite SSF score for this site was 9, which placed it in the <br />Stable erosion class. The tabulated results for this survey aze shown in ');able 7. The repaired <br />gully azeas (1997) in the upper portions of [his showed some signs of rilling from storm events <br />which occurred late summer 1997. These azeas appear to have stabilized with the establishment <br />of vegetation. No corrective measures aze planned as a result of [he inventory. <br />Table 7: Moffat Area Block 6 Erosion Condition Classification <br /> <br />Item Possible <br />Score <br />1998 <br />1997 <br />1996 <br />1995 1993 <br />Soil Movement 14 0 3 3 5 <br />Surface Litter 14 0 3 0 3 <br />Surface Rock Fragments 14 0 0 2 0 <br />Pedestalling 14 0 0 0 0 <br />Flow Pattems 15 0 3 5 6 <br />Rills 14 6 3 6 6 <br />Gullies 15 3 3 8 6 <br />Total 100 9 15 24 26 <br />Erosion Condition Classi fication: Stable Stable Slight Slight <br />• <br />7 <br />