Laserfiche WebLink
September 21, 2007.........Per Rule 2.6 (1), all motions shall be submitted in writing two (2) <br />working days after the PHC to the Boazd. <br />October 11, 2007.........Per Rule 2.6 (1), any written responses to motions must be filed with the <br />Board. <br />October 17, 2007.........Formalpubfic hearing of appeals. <br />SM-18 Schedule: <br />August 15, 2007.........the Alliance to submit brief in support of appeal to all pazties. <br />August 29, 2007.........the Division and Cotter Corporation to submit a response to the <br />Alliance's brief to all parties. <br />September 12, 2007.........the Alliance to submit a reply to the Division's response to all parties. <br />September 19, 2007.........Pre-hearing Conference, (PHC), which must be at least ten (10) <br />working days prior to the Hearing. The parties will exchange witness lists and exhibits. (The <br />Division is a party). <br />September 21, 2007.........Per Rule 2.6 (1), all motions shall be submitted in writing two (2) <br />working days after the PHC to the Board. <br />October 11, 2007.........Per Rule 2.6 (1), any written responses to motions must be filed with the <br />Boazd. <br />October 17, 2007.........Formal Public Hearing ofAppeals. <br />and in support thereof, state the following. <br />1. The Boazd had previously set these matters for hearing on April 11 and 12, 2007. <br />2. Cotter has informed the other Parties that monitoring data which the Division has <br />requested will not be available for submission until late Mayor later and that Cotter believes it <br />would be impossible for the Parties to proceed to hearing in April. <br />3. Based on the joint agreement of the parties, the Boazd vacated the April setting for a <br />Board hearing. <br />4. All parties seek to resolve this matter without further delay. <br />5. The parties agree that the mines at issue, M-1977-310, M-1984014, M-1977-306, M- <br />1978-116 will not resume operations until these appeals aze resolved. <br />-2- <br />