My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL34786
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL34786
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:56:05 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:03:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
10/16/1981
Doc Name
SENECA COALS LTD STIPULATION 10
Permit Index Doc Type
STIPULATIONS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' Mr. Tom Wainwright • • October 16, 1981 <br />- Seneca Coals, Ltd. p. 2 <br />Re :' Stipulation 10, Fish Creek <br />This impact is further discussed below and is not considered sig- <br />nificant enough to ararrant changes in the mine and reclamation <br />plan. <br />2. The proposed operations would not materially damage the quantity or <br />quality of water in surface and underground water systems that <br />supply those alluvial valley floors or portions of alluvial valley <br />floors. (Rule 2.06.8(5).(a)(ii). <br />As stated above, there is the slight potential for water quality <br />degradation in the AVF as a result of the proposed mining operations. <br />Information supplied by the applicant in the AVF study details. why <br />the potential for this impact is very slight. <br />Generally, since the mining operations are located within a portion <br />of the Fish Creek drainage (1.16% of the drainage area will be dis- <br />turbed), there is the potential for spoils water containing ele- <br />vated levels of dissolved solids to enter the Fish Creek AVF. The <br />mechanism for transport of this degraded water would probably be <br />through the alluvial aquifer of the unnamed tributary to Fish Creek <br />shown on Exhibit 7-16 of the AVF study. Water quality modeling <br />done by the applicant (AVF study, page 6) concludes that the <br />average TDS of Fish Creek could increase by 2% as a result of mining <br />operations. Resultant water quality would still be well within ac- <br />ceptable levels for irrigation purposes. <br />3. Surface coal mining and reclamation operations would be conducted <br />to preserve, throughout the mining and reclamation process, the es- <br />sential hydrologic functions of the alluvial valley floor. <br />(Rule 2.06.8(5)(a)(iii)). <br />The AVF itself would not be physically disturbed by mining. The <br />potential for water quality degradation, as discussed above, is not <br />considered substantial enough to warrant changes in the mine and <br />reclamation plan. Rather, the potential impact may be addressed in <br />the monitoring plan, to ensure that the essential hydrologic <br />functions are maintained. <br />Monitoring Plan--Findings <br />The applicant proposes to monitor water quality in the vicinity of <br />Fish Creek AVF as follows: <br />1. The water quality of discharges from the sediment pond located in <br />the unnamed tributary to Fish Creek will be monitored. <br />2. The water quantity and quality of the alluvial aquifer of the un- <br />named tributary to Fish Creek will be monitored ina well located <br />near where the drainage leaves the permit area. <br />3. The water quality and quantity of discharges on the southernmost <br />tributary of Fish Creek directly downstream from mining (SW-S2). <br />The monitoring plan provided by the applicant will meet the objectives <br />of Section 4.25.5 of the Colorado Permanent Regulatory Program. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.