Laserfiche WebLink
levels in Hubberson Gulch. TDS concentration of the irrigation water used on <br />this field is estimated to be 112 mg/I which equates to a specific conductance <br />of 2.0 millimhos/cm. In Tab 17, SCC presents an estimate of potential crop <br />reductions based on the increased salinity level of irrigation water in Hubberson <br />Gulch. SCC projects an estimated 1 percent yield reduction to the total <br />ranching operation. This is considered to be a negligible impact pursuan[ to the <br />Division's material damage guideline. <br />b. Due to the extremely limited acreage of proposed disturbance within the Sage <br />Creek watershed, and the fact that regional ground water flow is to the west, <br />the potential for material damage to the quality or quantity of water supplied to <br />the AVF is negligible. No measurable impacts to the quantity or quality of <br />water supplying the Sage Creek AVF are projected. <br />c. Background salinity levels in the lower segment of Dry Creek from the Yampa <br />River upstream to Section 28, Township 6 North, Range 88 West are high <br />enough that no degradation of water quality is anticipated due to mining. <br />Agricultural azeas potentially impacted by increased salinity levels include two <br />small subirrigated grass hayfields in Section 9, TSN, R88W and flood irrigated <br />grass and alfalfa haylands in Section 28, T6N, R88W. <br />With respect to the flood irrigated fields in Section 28, the application indicates <br />and includes detailed mapping and aerial photographs which show that the <br />subject fields are irrigated by water from J.C. Temple Reservoir N1, not from <br />Dry Creek. Thus, water supplying the irrigated fields would not be affected <br />by the mining operation. <br />With respect to the subirrigated fields in Section 9, the applicant conducted a <br />detailed evaluation of the potential reduction in crop production resulting from <br />the projected increase in salinity of the alluvial water. The material damage <br />evaluation is presented on pages 47 and 48 of Tab 17. The evaluation projects <br />a potential production decline of 1.9%, which is considered to be a negligible <br />impact, pursuant to the Division's material damage guidelines. <br />There is no projected diminution of water quantity supplied to the Dry Creek <br />~~ AVF. <br />~t' 3) Surface coal mining and reclamation operations will be conducted to preserve the <br />~~ / essential hydrologic functions of alluvial valley floors outside the permit area and <br />';~lp} ~ to reestablish the essential hydrologic functions of alluvial valley floors within the <br />40 .)„6, ~Q. affected area throughout the mining and reclamation process (4.24.2). <br />~-- ~!, ~,~,r. <br />~t~ An environmental monitoring system as described in Tab 15 of the permit <br />~~~ application has been installed, maintained, and operated by the permittee on all <br />Seneca II-W Findings Document 42 November 3, 1999 <br />