My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL34738
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL34738
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:56:03 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 8:01:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/3/1999
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION & FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE FOR PR2
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The applicant completed projections of overburden bulking, in order to project <br />post-mining topography within the mined area. The projections included within the <br />original application were completed prior to submittal in 1982. Subsequently, in <br />connection with operations at the existing Seneca II Mine, the applicant has completed <br />topographic observations of reclaimed land. These aerial observations have determined <br />that the actual bulking factor slightly exceeded the original projection (19.8 % in the <br />operator's terminology, versus 15.3 % projection). <br />In completing its review of the amended application, the Division converted the <br />applicant's analytical projections into an analytical format more familiar to the Division. <br />The applicant projects an average overburden swell factor (loose swollen overburden <br />volume divided by bank overburden volume) of 1.32. <br />Further, the applicant projects a bulking factor (swollen backfilled volume divided by <br />excavated pit volume) of 0.91. Considering the average mined depth and extracted seam <br />thickness, this suggests an average post-mining topographic deflation of 4.6 feet. <br />Adjusted for the possible 4.5 percent discrepancy in observed versus original projected <br />bulking discussed above, the post-mirting topography might rise by an additional 1.8 feet, <br />resulting in an average post-mining topographic deflation of 2.8 feet. In either case, the <br />projected post-mining topographic configuration is considered by the Division to <br />constitute an acceptable approximate original contour configuration. <br />The Division has approved a reclamation plan for delay in contemporaneous reclatation, <br />as allowed under Rule 4.14.1(1)(c). The approval was granted due to the nature of the <br />operation plan which entails concurrent mining of two separate mining areas (north and <br />south) with a single dragline. Pit development in both the north and south blocks begins <br />with an initial box cut. Development proceeds from each box cut in opposite directions <br />at different times during the operations plan. The sequence of pit development will not <br />allow for backfilling and grading to be completed within 180 days of coal removal. At <br />the point of maximum disturbance, there will be two open pits within each mining block. <br />Pursuant to Rule 4.14.1(1)(c), the Division is approving a variance from the requirement <br />that rough backfilling and grading be conducted within 180 days following coal removal. <br />This vaziance applies to the entire permit azea. In addition, a variance from the <br />requirement that there be no more than 4 spoil ridges behind the pit currently being work <br />is approved fora 25.5 acre area of the north block and a 41.8 acre azea of the south <br />block. Within these areas, as depicted on Exhibit 19-1, up to 11 spoil ridges will be <br />allowed between the two open pits in the north block and up to 11 spoil ridges will also <br />be allowed between the two open pits in the south block, to allow for sufficient <br />operational area to allow for highwall reduction grading. The additional spoils have been <br />accounted for in the reclamation cost estimate for the reclamation bond. <br />Seneca II-W Findings Document 35 November 3, 1999 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.