My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL34458
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL34458
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:55:55 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:56:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981037
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
10/1/1992
Doc Name
CORLEY CO CORRESPONDENCE OF SEPTEMBER 24 1992 GEC MINERALS THE GEC STRIP MINE PN C-81-037
From
DMG
To
THE CORLEY CO
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~ III IIIIIIIIIIIII III <br />• <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Deparlmenl o(Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman 8t., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Phone: 1303) 866-3567 <br />FAX:1303)832-8106 <br />October 1, 1992 <br />W.D. Corley, Jr. <br />The Corley Company <br />P.0. Box 1821 <br />Colorado Springs, CO 80901 <br />RE: Corley Company Correspondence of September 24, 1992, <br />GEC Minerals, The GEC Strip Mine, Permit No. C-81-037 <br />Dear Dr. Corley: <br />of cow <br />Ne <br />~~ b , <br />~I 0 <br />. ~!~ ~ <br />'!B ]6 <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br />At chael B. Long <br />Dimsion Director <br />On September 28, 1992, the Division received a letter from The Corley Company <br />dated September 24, 1992 regarding the September 10, 1992 joint inspection of <br />the GEC Strip Mine. Catherine Begej will be responding in the near future to <br />the items raised in this letter regarding czrtain sections of the Division <br />inspection rzport. <br />I am taking this opportunity to respond to the last paragraph of The Corley <br />Company letter. This portion of the letter reads "You treferring to <br />Ms. 6egej) did not mention that you initiated the suggestion that our approval <br />cf the reclamation work ~.vculd be conditional on your replacement, and you did <br />not mention that we accepted that suggestion." <br />have discussed this comment with both Ms. 6egej and Mr. Ste~ien G. Renner, <br />Supervisor of the Ceal Program ~.vithin our Division. It i; the consensus of <br />Mr. Renner and myself that, although the Civisicn is requesting information <br />from The Corley Company regarding the extent of GEC-related disturbance, and <br />has reflected the Company's concerns with our initial proposal by redrafting <br />the Section Z4 Bid Document, the ultimate "aGPrcval^ of the GEC Reclamation <br />Project lies not with The Corley Ccmoany but with the Division. Though The <br />Corley Company may voice dissatisfaction ~.vith the Division'; final plan, we <br />wish to reiterate that the State has an obligation to reclaim the GEC Strip <br />Mine to the highest level of regulatory standards possible given the financial <br />and operational constraints associated with the project. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.