Laserfiche WebLink
<br />addition at the crusher is increased. This increase in the lime added to the crushed ore <br />compensates for the lack of lime in the run-of-mine material. As an example, if the rate of lime <br />addition prior to loading run-of-mine were about 5.0 pounds per ton of ore, the rate will be <br />increased to about 7.5 pounds per ton during placement of run-of-mine ore, based on [he <br />proportion of crushed ore to run-of-mine delivered [o the Facility. The lime addition may, thus, <br />be consider as on a [ruck load-by-truck load basis. <br />The additional lime is distributed in the Valley Leach Facility by placing the run-of-mine ore in <br />the same location within the Valley Leach Facility as the crushed ore with higher lime content <br />is placed. The two ores are dumped or pushed together onto the advancing face of the ore lift <br />so as to create the "shingle" effect that you have observed. This process places run-of-mine ore <br />in close proximity to crushed ore and, therefore, in close proximity to the extra lime in the <br />crushed ore. The lime added from the lime storage silo at an increased rate during delivery of <br />run-of-mine ore to the Valley Leach Facility is, therefore, prorated throughout that part of the <br />Facility in which run-of-mine ore is being placed. <br />The mixing process is completed when leach solution percolates through the crushed ore with <br />elevated lime content and enters the run-of-mine ore at a slightly higher than normal (for the <br />leach solution) pH. <br />In summary, the compensation is accomplished by prorating the lime in the Valley Leach <br />Facility on a truck load-by-truck load basis and distributing the ore in a manner which places <br />the run-of-mine ore in contact with crushed ore containing a higher (than normal) lime <br />concentration. <br />The second question inquires as to the protocol of the water transmission testing performed on <br />the run-of-mine ore, and states: <br />"CC&VG reports that the run-of-mine material is significantly higher in <br />transmissivity, which should enhance eventual flushing detoxification. Who <br />supervised and who performed these tests? What were the specific testing and <br />monitoring protocols observed?" <br />[n its letter of October 16, 1996, CC&V presented the results of tests of both run-of-mine and <br />crushed ore. These were tests performed "in-house" by CC&V and employed vertical columns <br />filled with test material i^ accordance with established procedures to generate the "time to <br />"break-through" of solution applied to top of the columns. As CC&V described in this earlier <br />letter, run-of-mine material consisting of the minus 6" portion was loaded into vertical 10" <br />diameter columns. Identical columns were loaded with crushed material (the full size fraction). <br />Solution was applied to the top of the columns at measured rates. The time until water appeared <br />at the base of the column was measured. At a flow rate of 0.0004 g/m/ft2, 4-foot columns <br />demonstrated break-through times of 753 minutes for the crushed material and 864 minutes for <br />2 <br />