My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL33949
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL33949
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:55:40 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:46:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981037
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Name
PRELIMINARY ADEQUACY REVIEW COMPUTATION GEC STRIP MINE C-037-81
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />U EPARTMENT OF NATURAL Hf SUU11CE5 III III III III IIII III <br />D. Monte Pascoe, E.ecm rvC O~rca o: 999 <br /> <br />423 Centennial Huddmg.1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver. Colorado 80203 Tel (3031 839-3567 <br />David C. Shelton <br />Director <br />PRELIMINARY ADEQUACY REVIEW COh1PUTATZON <br />CEC STRIP MINE <br />rule (C-037-81) <br />?.03.3 AlI technical and baseline data/information supplied in the permit application <br />must be accompanied by the names (and affiliation) of researchers, dates, <br />and methodology associated with the collection and analysis of much <br />information. The list of contributions on pa yes 2.03=1,2 does not provide <br />these details. <br />'.03.4 The permit application must contain the names and addresses of every legal <br /> or equitable owner of record of the proF~erty to be mined; this has not been <br /> provided. <br />'.03.10 Copies of the licenses and permits listed, or of the applications, should <br /> be included in the application. <br />'.03.12 A copy of the advertisement and an affidaviC of publication must be <br /> supplied. <br />'.04.3 The USGS 7-1/2' topo sheet "ROCkvale, Colorado" sllolos two Pine Gulch <br /> entries; are botFr mines included as shown on map 21? <br />'.04.4 The State Fistoric Preservation Officer tras confirmed GEC's assertion that there are <br /> no known cultural or historic resources within the proposed permit area or <br /> adjacent areas. <br />.04.5- The geology and hydrology baseline data have Trot been supplied (except in <br />'.09.7 Tough draft form). This information is being assembled under SOAP contract <br /> and will be reviewed when it becomes available. <br />04.9 Soil samples Al, B1 and B2 are shown on map 1Z in disturbed areas; please <br />confirm that these samples were collected prior to disturbance. Sample A2 <br />appears to have been collected in an area mapped as Tecolote Stony Sandy Loam <br />rather than Pojoaque variant - Sedillo Complex which would mean that the <br />latter soil type was not sampled; please clarify. <br />Proceeding on the assumption that no further disturbance will occur in or <br />around the office/tipple area, no furtFler soil information will be required. <br />Soil stripping depths must be shown on a map. This map should indicate <br />topsoil and subsoil salvage depths to demonstrate adequacy of salvage plan. <br />The techniques to be used to segregate topsoil and subsoil must be outlined. <br />Reference is made to mixing Satanta subsoil with topsoil...this practice <br />does not comply with the performance standards of Rule 9.06.2(3). <br />(cont'd) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.