Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />By burying the concrete on site we may be able to get the cost of <br />Silo demolition and removal under $100,000.00. All of the <br />remaining facilities would probably be removed without cost to the <br />L1V1Sion (salvage Value) Please liGt2 taint taii5 e.~t iiuat2 ^vf the <br />Silo removal also includes the truck dump scale. <br />TASK 2: Coal Storaae Area <br />Since we will have equipment on site to enlarge the pond and move <br />the concrete around, we should include the Coal Storage Area in the <br />Bid Package. There are two scenarios that I briefly discussed with <br />you and Janet on Thursday. <br />The First scenario is to haul the coal material to the refuse pile <br />35 miles in Hotchkiss. At this point I do not know of the volumes <br />that we are dealing with. In some places there are large <br />stockpiles, and in other places it is relatively uniform. This <br />will be another measure I will attempt to get in the field. The <br />advantages of this option is that relatively all of the coal <br />material can be removed from the site allowing a better cover for <br />plant growth. The disadvantages of this option is that we would be <br />creating more disturbance on the refuse pile owned by the County <br />Health Department. The County may not want us to disturb the <br />refuse pile any further in the event that they would include this <br />area in their permit boundary. The cost of this task is also <br />something to consider. It will be relatively expensive to haul <br />anything out to the refuse pile. One final point is that even when <br />the material is removed, subsoil and topsoil may have to be hauled <br />in to cover the material. <br />The second scenario is to spread out the coal waste to a uniform <br />depth. There is roughly 4 acres of disturbance associated with the <br />coal waste. With this large acreage we would do not have enough <br />material to cover the coal refuse. The bid package would need to <br />include a cost for subsoil replacement. We currently have a <br />topsoil pile that could be spread marginally over the material. <br />The advantage of this scenario is that we would cut down the cost <br />of hauling the material to the refuse pile. The disadvantage is <br />that we would have to add a cost for hauling in foreign material to <br />cover the coal waste. <br />TASK 3: Refuse Pile <br />I have yet to contact the County Health Department regarding the <br />sampling conducted at the refuse pile. At this point in time I <br />feel that we should plan to reclaim the site as we are obligated to <br />do under our Rules and Regulations. We have been waiting for three <br />years to determine what the County intends to do with the land. In <br />any case, we are required to reclaim the site regardless of what <br />they intend to do. <br />This task would involve compaction, subsoil and topsoil replacement <br />at the refuse pile. The subsoil and topsoil piles are at a <br />relatively uniform and short push distance. This task may run in <br />