Laserfiche WebLink
II. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND <br />As contemplated by scheduling order, the present Reply Brief addresses the arguments raised by <br />the DRMS and Cotter and establishes the legal and factual basis for the MLRB to reinstate the <br />original, July 2005 DMO determination and to direct the timely preparation of an EPP that <br />should have been prepared for this and other uranium mines in Colorado in the mid-1990s upon <br />the amendment of the MLRA in 1993. <br />III. FACTUAL BACKGROUND <br />Although both Cotter and the DRMS take issue with some of Appellants' factual <br />characterizations, the parties agree upon the most salient points that establish the factual <br />background of the present appeal. <br />There is no dispute that the SM-18 mine is directly adjacent to a county road and located on <br />federal public land. There is no dispute that these lands remain open to multiple use by the <br />public. There is no dispute that exploration and mining have taken place on these federally leased <br />uranium deposits for nearly forty years. It is not disputed that the SM-18 mine site is comprised <br />of numerous built features, including: buildings and structures, mine-waste rock piles, <br />adits/inclines, vents, drill roads, drill holes, petroleum tanks, and retention ponds are found on <br />site. <br />All parties recognize that human health of workers and the general public maybe impacted by <br />exposure to both radiological and nonradiological hazards on the lease tracts. <br />Neither Cotter nor the DRMS dispute the history of health impacts and fatalities caused by <br />underground uranium mines in Western Colorado, as documented in reported federal court <br />opinions. <br />Neither Cotter nor the DRMS dispute that the SM-18 Mine operates pursuant to a 1996 federal <br />Department of Energy uranium mining lease with a 10 yeaz term. There remains some dispute as <br />to the status of the federal lease, identity of operator(s), and the right of entry. However, because <br />the lease status is not central to the question of DMO status, Appellants will not present further <br />background on the right-of entry question. <br />Neither Cotter nor DRMS dispute that the Department of Energy is engaged in an ongoing clean- <br />up and decontamination of numerous uranium mines and milling sites in the Uravan Mineral Belt <br />and that the DOE has paid Cotter to clean up and reclaim many federal mines in Western <br />Colorado. <br />This mine has been operating sporadically since first obtaining an MLRB permit in 1978. The <br />DRMS file indicates that for much of that time, approximately 25 years, SM-18 has been idle and <br />in voluntary cessation status. Agency records, including those of MSHA, have identified multiple <br />health and worker exposure violations at the SM-18 mine. DRMS inspections have also <br />documented concerns and problems at this mine. <br />