My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL33897
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL33897
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:55:38 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:45:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
12/21/1999
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance for SL2
From
Partial Phase II 319.5 acres
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Bond Release Insaection <br />The Division conducted a bond release inspection on October 20. 1999. The site was inspected in <br />accordance with Section 3.03.2(2). Forrest Luke and Karl Koehler represented Trapper. Tom <br />Kaldenbach represented the Division, Randal Pair represented the Office of Surface Mining, and <br />Rob Emst represented the Bureau of Land Management. The bond release parcels are on land owned <br />by Trapper Mining Inc. and the State of Colorado. Although the State Board of Land Commissioners <br />was notified of the inspection, no one from that agencey attended. <br />Technical Review <br />Following the bond release inspection, the Division reviewed technical aspects of Trapper's bond <br />release submittal in order to determine if Phase Il bond release is warranted. The review evaluated <br />the methods that Trapper used in gathering and processing the data in the bond release submittal. <br />The review considered the technical validity of conclusions presented in the submittal. Those <br />conclusions were then compared to the requirements of Trapper's approved reclamation plan and <br />to the regulatory requirements for Phase II bond release. <br />Adequacy Questions and Responses <br />No adequacy issues resulted from the Division's review of Trapper's submittal. A gully was found <br />during the bond release inspection on parcel D-AB-95 (see the inspection report for a description). <br />Trapper repaired the gully a few days later. The repair would not re-initiate the 10-year bond <br />release liability period because the repair was done in the first five years of the period as allowed in <br />Section 4.15.7(5). The parcel was seeded in 1995. <br />Comments and Objections <br />The Division received no comments, written objections, or requests for an informal conference <br />regarding the bond release application. <br />III. CRITERIA AND SCHEDULE FOR PHASE II BOND RELEASE <br />Postminine Land Use and Reve2etation Success <br />A Phase Il bond release is allowed by those pans of Section 3.03.1(2)(6) which say, "Up to eighty- <br />Five percent of the applicable bond amount shall be released upon the establishment of vegetation <br />which supports the approved postmining land use...." and "....which meets the approved success <br />standard for cover based on statistically valid data collected during a single year of the liability <br />period." For a Phase II bond release occurring prior to a Phase III (final) bond release (as in the <br />current bond release), the Division evaluates the bond release vegetation for its progress toward <br />supporting the post-mining land use upon final bond release. <br />Trapper Mine <br />Phase II Band Release Page 3 <br />12/23/99 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.