Laserfiche WebLink
<br />_,!.i . <br />~ r.. c <br />~. I I <br />~~: a <br />XXII. Miscellaneous Compliance-Rules 2.05.6(5), 4.02, 4.12, 4.19, 4.21 <br />4.28 and 4.30 (cont'd <br />The proposed operation is in compliance with the requirements of this section. <br />XXIII. Operation on Lands Subjecb to Limitations or Prohibitions-Rules 2.03.7 <br />and 2.10 <br />The proposed operation is in compliance with the requirements of these sections <br />and Rule 2.07.6(2)(d) for the following reasons: <br />1. The permit area of the proposed operation is not within: <br />a. an area designated unsuitable for mining; <br />b. an area under study for designation as unsuitable for surface coal <br />mining; <br />c. on any Iands subject to prohibitions or Iimitations; <br />XXIV. Demonstration that Surface Coal hfining and Reclamation.Operations <br />can be Feasibly Accomplished-Rule 2.07.6(2)(b) <br />Contingent upon the satisfactory resolution of stipulations presented in <br />this findings document, the following finding of compliance is presented. <br />Pursuant.to Rule 2.07.6(2)(b) the Division finds, based on information in <br />the application and from all available sources, that surface coal mining and <br />reclamation operations can be feasibly accomplished under the mining and <br />reclamation plan contained in the application. <br />XXV. Compatibility with Anticipated Adjacent Operations-Rule 2.07.6(2)(1) <br />Pursuant to Rule 2.07.6(2)(1) the Division finds that the McClane Canyon <br />operation will not be inconsistent with other operations anticipated to be <br />performed in areas adjacent to the proposed permit area. <br />XXVI. Reclamation Fees Required by 30 CFR, Chapter VII, Subschapter R-Rule <br />2.07.6(2)(0) <br />Based on communication with OSM personnel, pursuant to Rule 2.07.6(2)(0) the <br />Division finds that the applicant is in compliance with the payment of recla- <br />mation fees. AlI reclamation fees required by 30 CFR, Chapter VIZ, Subchapter <br />R have been paid. <br />