My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL33542
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL33542
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:55:28 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:39:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
9/24/2001
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION & FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE FOR RN4
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
13. The Division has previously approved the post-mining land use of the operation. <br />It was determined that a restoration to rangeland and wildlife habitat meets the <br />requirements of Rule 4.16 for the permit area (2.07.6(2)(1)). Post-mining <br />commercial land-use for the Oak Creek facilities area also meets the requirements <br />of Rule 4.16. <br />14. The Division has contacted the Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation Fees <br />Branch. As of this time, Pittsburg & Midway, the operator, is current in the <br />payment of reclamation fees required by 30 CFR Chapter VII, subchapter R. <br />(2.07.6(2)(0)). <br />I5. The Division finds that the activities proposed by the applicant would not affect <br />the continued existence of endangered or threatened species or result in the <br />destruction or adverse modification of their critical habitats (2.07.6(2)(n)). <br />16. Specific approvals have been granted or aze proposed. These approvals aze <br />addressed in the following section, Section B (2.07.6(2)(m)). <br />SECTION B -Findings and Specific Approvals Required by Rule 4 <br />I. Roads -Rule 4.03 <br />A. Haul Roads <br />1. The applicant made a demonstration, based on site specific <br />precipitation rates, percent of grade, and soil properties, that use of <br />alternative specifications for culvert and bridge sizing will not <br />result in increased erosion. Along selected segments of the haul <br />road in the Moffat Area, the spacing of culverts was not in <br />compliance with Rule 4.03.I(4)(e)(vi). A vaziance was granted <br />based on the following findings: <br />a) Stable road embankments were designed; <br />b) Culverts were located in areas of preferred or existing <br />drainage; <br />c) Road grades were not excessive; and <br />d) All haul roads are contained within a sediment control <br />system. <br />Edna Mine 15 Permit Renewal No. 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.