My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL33245
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL33245
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:55:20 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:35:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977211
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
8/31/2001
From
US DEPT OF AGRIGULTURE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pikeview Quarry -Decision Notice and FONSI <br />08/30/01 <br />Paee 5 <br />Under the proposed action, the reclamation on National Forest System lands would be <br />implemented concurrently with production. The reclamation phase of the proposed <br />action would follow the production phase as mining progresses from west to east. <br />Final reclatation would be completed one to two years after mining has been <br />completed. Both base and enhanced reclamation on private land would be <br />implemented under this alternative. <br />The reclamation of public lands will be done in accordance with applicable USDA- <br />NRCS specifications, standards and guidelines. USDA Forest Service standards <br />specific to the use of plant material and seeded species from local native plants will <br />also apply to the reclamation activities. Detailed descriptions of the different phases <br />of the proposed action are included in the EA. <br />• Alternative C includes the current mining and reclamation operations and enhanced <br />reclamation. Under this alternative current mining and reclamation activities would <br />continue for 5 to 8 years, depending upon the quantity of materials to be extracted and <br />the duratiop of the reclamation work. This alternative would involve the same <br />limestone production as under Alternative A, and enhanced reclamation would occur <br />in addition to the base reclamation. <br />This alternative would not allow for the reclamation of steep slopes along the west <br />boundary of the quarry. Instead, backfilling materials and topsoil would be <br />accumulated against existing steep slopes to provide relative stabilization. Thus, no <br />federal lands would be affected. <br />The estimaled remaining 6 million tons of limestone would be sold throughout the <br />next 5 to 8 years depending on market demand for this material. No additional <br />limestone would be produced because of safety issues related to the steep limestone <br />slopes on the west part of the quarry. <br />Comparison of Alternatives <br />The criteria selected by the Forest Service for evaluation of alternatives were based <br />primarily upon environmental and feasibility factors. In particular, alternatives with <br />reduced environmental impacts aad with reclamation potential were favored. Other <br />considerations included the potential for mitigating the visual impacts of the previously <br />mined area and the measurable long term benefits. <br />• Alternative A -Under this alternative, the nuisance factors associated with the <br />current quarry operations would continue for 5 to 8 years and base reclamation would <br />' be applied to the private lands except in the steep western walls of the quarry. No <br />National Forest System lands would be affected. However, without the layback soil <br />losses due to slope wasting, wind and water erosion processes would continue to <br />occur due to previous mining and to the lack of reclamation works in the site. The <br />scar in those areas of the quarry immediate east of the western boundary would <br />remain a visual eyesore <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.