My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL33245
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL33245
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:55:20 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:35:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977211
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
8/31/2001
From
US DEPT OF AGRIGULTURE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pikeview Cjnarry-Decision Notice and FONSI <br />08/30/01 <br />erosion control. The importance of this additional effort and the relatively small <br />implementation costs led to its inclusion in all the alternatives evaluated in detail, except <br />for the No Action Alternative. Therefore the proposed layback without enhanced <br />reclamation was not analyzed further <br />The alternatives analyzed in detail in the EA are summarized below: <br />Alternative A is the no action alternative. Under the No Action alternative, the <br />Forest Service would not authorize the implementation of the proposed action, and <br />the Special Use Application submitted by Castle Concrete would be denied. The <br />mining activity would continue for about 5 to 8 years, and reclamation of some areas <br />in the quarry would be implemented according to the base reclamation plan already <br />permitted by the Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology (CDMG). This <br />alternative does not include enhanced reclamation in the currently permitted mining <br />areas. The estimated 6 million tons of limestone left in the quarry would be sold at a <br />rate defined by market demand. Currently production averages 1 million tons per <br />year. <br />Alternative B is the proposed action submitted by Castle Concrete. Under the <br />proposed action, the applicant would expand the quarry to occupy up to 26 acresz of <br />National Forest System land in order to lay back the top cut and implement enhanced <br />reclamation. The proposed layback operation (also referred to as west reclamation) <br />would occyr in addition to the current Pikeview Quarry reclamation in akeady <br />permitted mining areas. It would allow the reclamation of the currently steep. slopes <br />on the west side of the quarry thus improving their stability and the mining of <br />additional materials close to the steep slopes that currently remain inaccessible due to <br />safety issues. <br />Current operations and production levels would continue and the overall life of the <br />mine, including mining and reclamation, would be extended fi-om about 5 to 8 years <br />to about 12 years. Mining would continue for about 10 years and reclamation would <br />continue until 2 years after the conclusion of the mining operations. Current <br />operations include 20 to 25 employees, working Monday through Saturday from lam <br />to Spm. <br />After reclamation, it is anticipated that the steep slopes on private land (quarry back <br />walls) would become open space. The primary post-mining land use identified in the <br />proposed plan for that area is wildlife habitat. The applicant is considering the <br />reclamation of the lower (flat) areas of the mine for light industrial use but no definite <br />development plan exists at the present time. <br />2 Although the applicant would have 26 acres available (or the layback operation, current mrnuig plans indicate that <br />only about 13 acres would b: needed. In addiuon to the 13 acres dvectly a[iected by the layback, part of the permined <br />area would be used to stockpile topsoil <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.