Laserfiche WebLink
DECISION NOTICE <br />AND <br />FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT <br />Pikeview Quarry <br />USDA Forest Service <br />Pike and San Isabel National Forests, <br />Cimarron and Comanche National Grasslands <br />Pikes Peak Ranger District <br />EI Paso, Colorado <br />INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND <br />Castle Concrete Company (Castle Concrete) has submitted aSpecial-Use Application to <br />the Pike National Forest proposing to lay back the top cut ofthe Pikeview Quarry to <br />facilitate the reclamation of areas disturbed from limestone extraction during the last 100 <br />years. The top ofthe cut ofthe mined azea is currently at the National Forest Boundary, <br />and the proposed layback would be on National Forest System lands. <br />The Pikeview Quarry is north of Colorado Springs at the southern edge ofthe United <br />States Air Force Academy. The quarry is located partially within the City of Colorado <br />Springs and partially in El Paso County and mining activities are limited to the areas of <br />the quarry within EI Paso County. It was first mined in the early 1900s, and has been <br />mined by Castle Concrete since 1970. Pikeview Quarry currently covers an area of 210 <br />permitted acres, and produces limestone aggregate. <br />The previously mined area is extremely steep and poses serious stability concerns. The <br />layback ofthe top cut is proposed as a possible solution to stabilizing the highwall and <br />softening the visual impacts ofthe current steep slopes. The proposed layback would <br />involve up to 26 acrest of National Forest System lands and would include recontouring <br />the disturbed aeeas to represent natural appearing topography and revegetation of <br />disturbed areas to reduce erosion, mitigate visual impacts, and restore biological <br />productivity. Reclamation on National Forest System lands would be done in accordance <br />with applicable USDA-NAGS specifications, standards and guidelines. <br />In addition to providing stability and improving the visual impacts ofthe quarry, the <br />proposed layback would allow Castle Concrete to mine additional materials close to the <br />steep slopes that currently remain inaccessible due to safety issues. <br />I Although the applicant would have 26 acres available Cor the layback operation, current mirdrtg plans indicate that <br />only about 13 acres would lx needed In addition to the 13 acres directly affected by the layback, part of the permitted <br />area would be used to stockpile topsoil. <br />