Laserfiche WebLink
-67- <br />X2. Topsoil - Rules 2.04.9, 2.05.3(5), 2.05.4(2)(d), and 4.06 <br />Soils Resources Information is presented on pages 50-54 of the Bear No. 1 and No. 2 <br />application and pages 2.04-39 through 2.04-93 and in Exhibit 9 of the Bear No. 3 <br />application. Information on topsoil salvage can be found on page 65 of the first <br />application and 2.05-24 of the second application. Topsoil redistribution is <br />addressed on page 7I of the first application and pages 2.05-39 and 4.06-I of the <br />second application. <br />The soil type which has been affected by surface facilities at the Bear No. 1 and <br />No. 2 mines and which will be disturbed by the surface facilities associated with <br />the proposed Bear No. 3 mine on the flood plain of the North Fork is the Breece <br />Loam. The Breece Loam is described as a moderately well drained soil developed on <br />relatively level alluvial fans, flood plains, and terraces characterized by a dark <br />brown Loam surface layer up to 19" thick underlain by a sandy loam to a depth of <br />60". Composite samples (15" soil cores) taken in the proposed Bear No. 3 <br />facilities area indicate a sandy loam surface, moderate pH and low salinity and <br />sodium adsorption ratio valves (Table 7, page 2.04-41). The applicant proposes to <br />salvage the top 15 inches of the soil at the proposed Bear No. 3 facilities area. <br />The majority of the area disturbed at the existing operation has been disturbed since <br />1934, and no topsoil was salvaged initially. <br />Other mapping units on the permit area include Beenom-Absarokee Association soils <br />which are shallow, well drained soils on steep mountain side slopes, with thicker <br />deposits developing on the lower portions of the slopes. Moderately sloping uplands <br />and valley side slopes are included in the Absarokee-Work Loam unit, characterized <br />by predominantel_y loamy surface soils overlying sandstone, with soil thicknesses <br />of over 60" in depressions and swales. Previous portal development at the Bear <br />No. 1, No. 2 and at the proposed Bear No. 3 mine has disturbed soils of the <br />Beenom-Absarokee Association, but no further disturbance of this soil is proposed. <br />A number of problems were noted in the P.A.R, of May I8, 1981 regarding topsoil infor- <br />mation provided in the original application. Most of the concerns were satisfied <br />in the applicant's responses to that letter, though a few questions remained, and <br />were included in the review letter of January 18, 1982. <br />The Division noted that the applicant proposed to redistribute a 6" depth of top- <br />soil on 5 acres of the disturbed area including the reclaimed No. 2 portals, the <br />refuse pile and an area north of the river. The application stated that, due to an <br />insufficient volume of topsoil existing in the stockpiles on site, 2400 cubic yards <br />of soil would be imported. The Division requested that the source of the soil be <br />specified and appropriate analyses be provided. <br />In the responses, the applicant stated that arrangements had been made with the <br />Colorado Highway Department and ARCO to salvage topsoil that will be disturbed by <br />the Highway Department's river channel relocation project. The volume of soil will <br />be sufficient, when added to the existing topsoil in storage, to cover the entire <br />regraded area with 6 inches of topsoil. ~;i~ applicant iiae co: ..:i ttew, wi ti~in i~ic <br />application,_to rovide_ analyses Of pH, texture, SAR and EC to the Di vi Sion_prior_to <br />salvage operations. Following topsoil distribution, results of soil fertility testing <br />will be submitted to the Division. Topsoiling operations will be completed by Fal.i of I9~2. <br />The application stated that topsoil would be redistributed with a front-end loader. <br />The Division requested that the applicant be more specific with respect to how <br />topsoil would be distributed and stabilized on the steep slopes of the backfilled <br />portals. In responses, the applicant explained that a small crawler tractor would <br />be used in combination with the loader. The steep face-up area above the backfilled <br />portals will not be topsoiled, but a netting will be tacked onto the face for <br />stabilization after seeding. <br />