My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL33122
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL33122
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:55:16 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:31:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981033
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
3/31/1982
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION and FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE
From
Mine No. 1, No. 2 & No. 3
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-v2- <br />The effects of the waste piles on flow in the North Fozk of the Gunnison can be <br />evaluated using the mass balance - mixing ~rndel shown above. This requires <br />estimating the total dissolved solids concentration of the leachate from the pile <br />and estimating the rate of discharge to stream - alluvial aquifer system. The <br />total dissolved solids concentration can be overestimated by using a concentration <br />based on analyses of spoil waters in other parts of the state, 3000 mg/1. The <br />chemistry of the leachate would probably be a sodium-bicarbonate type water with <br />relatively low type metal concentrations. The rate of discharge can be estimated <br />from the water balance provided in the Orchard Valley permit application. This <br />water balance estimated subsurface runoff to be 2.8 in/yr. Assuming that most of <br />the water for subsurface flow and deep seepage is the result of snowmelt, it may <br />be that this discharge is limited to a 60 day period, the rate of discharge can <br />be calculated. <br />(13 acres surface area) x (2.8 in) (1/12) = 3 acre feet of water. <br />(3 acre feet) x 43,560 ft3/acre feet e 60 days - 24 hrs - 60 min/hr e 60 sec/min = 0.03 cfs <br />aay <br />Using an estimated concentration of 3000 mg/1 and an estimated discharge of <br />0.03 cfs, the effects of the waste rock piles and mine water drainage upon the <br />North Fork of the Gunnison under average flow conditions can be estimated. <br />Cd (432 cfs)(95 mg/1) + (0.25 cfs) (3500 mg/I) + (0.03. cfs) (3000 mg/1) <br />432 + 0.25 + 0.03 <br />Cd = 97.2 mg/1 <br />This results in a 2.2 mg/1 increase over baseline conditions, which is insig- <br />nificant. In addition, it is probably an overestimation, since seepage in the <br />piles is the result of snowmelt and would probably occur when stream flows are much <br />higher than average. <br />3. Depletion of Streamflow <br />Experience with underground mines throughout the state as well as in the North <br />Fork area indicates that mine inflows are not normally significant when ephemeral <br />streams are undermined. Most of the streams to be undermined in this area are <br />ephemeral and would not be expected to be significantly affected by mining. Two <br />mining operations, Mt. Gunnison and Somerset, would undermine perennial drainages <br />tributary to the North Fork of the Gunnison. <br />Subsidence could reduce Streamflow by directly diverting surface flow and alluvial <br />ground water into the bedrock ground water system. This affect is undersirabZe <br />both because of the hydrologic effects and the mine operation problems it could <br />produce. The Mt. Gunnison application has proposed a subsidence protection plan <br />for the Dry Fork of Minnesota Creek to protect Streamflow. The adequacy of this <br />protection plan has not been assessed as a part of this permit review. The <br />Division has stipulated that site specific monitoring data concerning subsidence <br />and its hydrologic effects be taken into account in the design of any protection <br />plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.