My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL33122
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL33122
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:55:16 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:31:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981033
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
3/31/1982
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION and FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE
From
Mine No. 1, No. 2 & No. 3
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-6Z- <br />Cd = QuCU.+ QmCm <br />Qu - Qm <br />where Cm = concentration in the mine discharge, <br />Cd = downstream concentration, <br />Cu = upstream concentration, <br />Q.u = upstream river discharge rate, and <br />Qm = mine discharge rate. <br />was used to estimate the downstream concentrations. Using data from the USGS <br />gaging station at Somerset the lowest monthly mean of 45.2 cfs for the water <br />year 1979, a very conservative estimate can be made. (The average discharge <br />for the past 45 years is 432 cfs.) Waste quality data from that same year show <br />an average TDS of 95 mg/1. <br />Cd = (45.2 cfs) (95 mg/Z) +(0.25 cfs)(3,500 mg/1) <br />(45.2 cfs) + (0.25 cfs) <br />Cd = 113.7 mg/1 <br />This equation predicts a downstream concentration of 113.7 mg/1 during periods <br />of low flow. (This is an increase of 20 mg/1.) This increase in concentration <br />would not limit downstream water use. Under average flow conditions, the expected <br />increase would be less than 2 mg/I. <br />A complete water chemistry of this discharge has not been provided. However, <br />experience at other mining operations would suggest it to be a sodium-bicarbonate <br />type water with relatively low trace metal concentrations. <br />2. Seepage from Waste Rock/Coal Refuse Piles <br />The North Fork area contains several historic, existing, or proposed waste rock/ <br />coal refuse piles. Mt. Gunnison's currently approved five year permit includes <br />a small waste rock pile ( 1 acre) with a larger pile of approximately 10 acres <br />anticipated in the future. The Orchard Valley mine has an existing waste rock <br />pile (5 acres), and Western Slope Carbon has recently reclaimed a small waste rock <br />pile ( 4 acres). The Somerset mine plan area includes two historic waste rock/ <br />coal waste disposal areas, the Hubbard Creek site was used from 1970 until 1977, <br />and the East Yazd site ( 9 acres) was used as a waste dump prior to 1969 but is <br />currently part of the surface facilities area. All future waste rock at Somerset <br />will be disposed of underground or at a waste disposal site to be established at <br />the area of the C seam mine portals (1 .2 acres) after the final sealing of these <br />portals. <br />Most of these waste rock/coal refuse piles are located in areas away from the <br />North Fork stream - alluvial aquifer system, and seepage could reach the stream - <br />alluvial aquifer system only after considerable dilution. Two sites, however, <br />the Somerset East Yard, and western Slope Carbon's Crystal Meadow site are adjacent <br />to streams, where seepage from the piles might enter the stream - alluvial aquifer <br />system. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.