My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL32987
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL32987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:55:13 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:28:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
3/2/1984
Doc Name
Revised Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
X11 ~~~'~~ <br />Water levels in the underlying regional rock aquifers, the Trout Creek <br />sandstone (Eagle No. 5 Mine) and the Twentymile sandstone (Eagle No.9 Mine), <br />show no signs of depletion. The Trout Creek sandstone is separated from the <br />Eagle No. 5 Mine in the "F" seam by 320 to 360 feet of shales, siltstones, <br />sandy shales, thin sandstones and coals. Ground water levels in the Trout <br />Creek sandstone show no evidence of dewatering into overlying mine workings. <br />Also, inflows through the Eagle No. 5 Mine's floor strata (underlying strata) <br />are very minor. The Trout Creek sandstone remains confined, as evident in the <br />continued artesian pressures sustained in the companies water supply well <br />completed in this aquifer. <br />Empire Energy Corporation has predicted no impact to the quantity of ground <br />water in the Twentymile sandstone through dewatering into mine workings. The <br />over and underlying strata have sufficient thicknesses and low permeabilities <br />to prevent the dewatering of the Twentymile sandstone aquifer into either the <br />underlying Eagle No. 5 Mine or the overlying Eagle No. 9 Mine. The <br />hydrograph, Figure III-17d of the permit application, for this aquifer shows <br />no water level declines, thus this aquifer is not being impacted by either the <br />Eagle No. 5 Mine or the Eagle No. 9 Mine. <br />Dewatering of the White sandstones may impact discharges to Yampa River/Big <br />Bottom stream/alluvial system and may cause dewatering of stream/alluvial <br />system. The applicant has addressed the interrelationship between the three <br />White Sandstones and the Yampa River/Big Bottom stream/alluvial system. The <br />applicant has made a worst-case projection of the current stream depletions <br />from the Yampa River by the Eagle No. 9 Mine. These projections were made <br />using an equation developed by McWhorter (1981). The depletion of stream flow <br />from the Yampa River was calculated to be 35 gpm from a combined "P" seam and <br />White Sandstone subcrop areas which are 1,737 feet in length and are 2,000 <br />feet from the mine workings (page III-77a, revised 10/24/83). The stream <br />flows depletions through the "P" coal seam and the 3 White Sandstones are <br />expected to increase as the mine workings move closer to the subcrop areas and <br />beneath the Yampa River. <br />Mining in the Eagle No. 9 Mine could cause declines in alluvial ground water <br />levels in the Big Bottom alluvium. Dewatering the Big Bottom alluvium may <br />occur through the "P" coal seam, the White sandstones, and overlying <br />discontinuous, lenticular and interbedded sandstones of the Williams Fork <br />Formation. Communication between the ground water in the alluvium and the <br />Eagle No. 9 Mine workings may be enhanced by faults and subsidence induced <br />fractures. The dewatering of the alluvial body may impact flood and <br />subirrigation on the Big Bottom alluvial valley floor. The declines in <br />alluvial ground water levels could result from; 1) dewatering through faults <br />and fractures to the mine workings; 2) dewatering through subcrops of the "P" <br />coal seam and the affected over and underlying water-bearing strata; and 3) <br />reducing the quantity of ground water naturally discharging to the alluvium at <br />subcrops of rock aquifers by diversion of this discharge water into the mine <br />workings; and 4) dewatering through subsidence induced fractures. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.