My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL32987
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL32987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:55:13 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:28:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
3/2/1984
Doc Name
Revised Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />The Eagle No. 5 Mine is impacting the quantity of ground water in the Middle <br />sandstone. Figures III-17a through III-17c, in the application, contain <br />hydrographs of ground water levels for the Middle sandstone over time. These <br />hydrographs show steady declines in ground water levels for the period from <br />July, 1981 to April, 1983. The rate of ground water level decline is as much <br />as 33 feet per year (in well 81-01). The applicant acknowledges, on page <br />III-42, that these declines are probably related to drainage of the Middle <br />sandstone to the underground mine workings. These declines in Middle <br />sandstone water levels will not impact any water wells (ground water use), <br />since presently there are no ground water wells completed in this aquifer. <br />The Eagle No. 5 Mine may be depleting the quantity of water in the Yampa and <br />Williams Fork stream/alluvial systems. These depletions could result from <br />diverting surface flows through the subcrop areas of the "F" coal seam and the <br />Middle sandstone beneath the rivers through these aquifers and into the mine <br />workings. The company has projected the current stream depletions by the <br />Eagle No. 5 Mine using the equation developed by McWhorter (1981). The <br />company has projected that the current rate of stream depletion may equal 180 <br />gpm or 0.4 cfs. This rate would be 2X of the 7-day, 10-year low flow (27.8 <br />cfs) (pages III-77a and 78 revised 10/24/83). These projected stream flow <br />depletions are not expected to increase during the remainder of the 5-year <br />permit period.. <br />Monitoring data provided by the applicant shows that the Eagle No. 9 Mine is <br />impacting the quantity of ground water in the first White sandstone. Figures <br />III-17e through III-17g, in the application, contain hydrographs for this <br />sandstone aquifer. In these hydrographs, the first White sandstone has shown <br />ground water level declines of approximately 25 ft/yr in well 81-03, of 8 <br />ft/yr in well 61-04a, and no decline in well 81-19. Ground water levels show <br />higher rates of decline in wells closer to the Eagle No. 9 Mine workings. <br />Page TII-50 of the permit application acknowledges that the mine workings have <br />caused some drainage of this aquifer. <br />Empire Energy Corporation has modeled the drawdown cone (decline in the ground <br />water levels) in the White sandstone over the 5-year permit period (pages <br />III-76 to III-77 revised 70-24-83). The predicted drawdown in the 3 White <br />sandstones at one mile from the center of the mine is 130 feet, at 2 miles is <br />40 feet, at 3 miles is 15 feet, and at 4 miles is less than 5 feet. Empire <br />Energy Corporation has identified one water supply well completed within the <br />White Sandstones. This well is owned by Francis Lux and is located about one <br />mile from the center of the mine. The company has predicted that drawdowns <br />caused by the mine in the well one mile from the center of mine may reach 130 <br />feet. This would indicate that the Eagle No. 9 Mine may adversely affect the <br />Lux water supply well. If this well is adversely affected (e.g., no longer <br />provides a dependable water supply), the company has committed to drilling a <br />replacement water supply well (page III-77, revised 10/24/83). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.