My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL32936
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL32936
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:55:12 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:28:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
9/30/1993
Doc Name
Phase II Bond Release App TOC To Page 33
Permit Index Doc Type
VEGETATION
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />' For statistical purposes, each cover transect (comprising 50 data points) served as a <br />sample unit. Data points recorded the first vertical "hit" on vegetation, rock, soil, or <br />' litter (above or below the instrument) Subsequent "hits" were recorded to determine <br />relative cover. Cover data was recorded and reported by individual plant species. The <br />first interception was used to calculate cover values. The quantitative cover data <br />' provided the basis for calculation of species composition diversity. <br />SAMPLE ADEQUACY <br />Sample adequacy calculations were undertaken for vegetative cover sampling in the <br />' reference area and Areas 1 and 2. The following formula was used for these <br />calculations: <br />-(t)?-(s)~---- <br />nm~ _ <br />(d Xbar)Z <br />' where: non =minimum sample size <br />t =the Student's t distribution value at the 90% confidence level and <br />sample degrees of freedom <br />s =sample standard deviation (s)Z= sample variance <br />d =percent acceptable deviation from the mean (10%) <br />' Xbar =sample mean <br />Sample adequacy was achieved for vegetation cover sampling in all areas sampled. <br />' Vegetation cover was tested at the 90% confidence level. Twelve samples were taken <br />in the Upland Sagebrush Reference Area. Ten samples were taken in Area 1. Sixteen <br />' samples were taken in Area 2. <br />STATISTICAL ANALYSIS <br />' Evaluation of revegetation establishment and success was accomplished through a <br />separate comparison of each areas mean vegetative cover with the mean vegetative <br />' cover of the Upland Sagebrush Reference Area. Aone-tailed Students t test (Zar, <br />1974) was used to determine whether the mean vegetation cover of each area was <br />significantly less than 90Y6 of the reference area cover with 904'o confidence. This <br />' evaluation is consistent with that recommended by the Division of Minerals and <br />Geology in their 1988 Guidelines for Compliance with Land Use and Vegetation <br />Requirements of the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board for Coal Mining. <br />' Analysis of quantitative relative cover data derived from quantitative total cover <br />information provided the basis for assessment of species composition. <br />1 <br /> <br /> 6 <br />' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.