Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />' II. METHODS - ---- -------- - <br /> TIl1'II1VG <br />' Field investigation was undertaken during the period July 5-July 8, 1993. This time <br /> period coincided with anthesis and maximum development of the majority of plant <br /> species found in both the native vegetation community (Upland Sagebrush Reference <br />' Area) and the two areas to be evaluated for revegetation establishment (Area 1 and <br /> Area 2). The timing of vegetation sampling was discussed with Messrs. Dan Mathews, <br /> Harry Ranney, and Tony Waldron of the Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology, <br /> and they concurred with the sampling dates. Mr. Waldron was also present during the <br /> field sampling of a portion of Area 2. <br />' SAMPLING DESIGN <br />' Prior to initiation of field work, the permit document, and applicable maps, and aerial <br />photographs were reviewed to evaluate topography, reclamation timing, seed mixes, <br /> revegetation methods, and applicable revegetation standards at both areas. <br />' A 1:4800 scale (1"=400') map of the reclaimed mine site (permit document Exhibit <br /> 22-1, Postmine Vegetation Map: Nucla Mine) was used to delineate the three sampling <br /> areas. On the map, a Cartesian coordinate grid (50x50 feet for the reference area, <br />' 100x100 feet for Areas l and 2) was established for each of the three areas. Sample <br /> sites were established using random methods. A minimum of twenty random sample <br />' locations were initially established for each area. Sample sites were located in the field <br /> through compass triangulation and pacing from known landmarks. Since Areas 1 and 2 <br /> wntained reclaimed and revegetated areas of differing ages, each different age stand <br />' was measured on the map to determine aerial extent. Samples within Areas 1 and 2 <br /> were taken to proportionally represent these different age stands. Further, Area 2 <br />' sampling took into account the proportion of untopsoiled area within Area 2 and <br />sampled accordingly. Figure 4 illustrates the location of the Upland Sagebrush <br /> Reference Area, Area 1, Area 2, and sample point locations. <br />FIELD SAMPLING <br />Vegetation cover was estimated by the use of the point-intercept method. An ocular <br />point frame (ESCO Associates) was used to minimize instrument error and maximize <br />precision and observer accuracy. Due to the small size of the Upland Sagebrush <br />Reference Area (approximately 2.5 acres) transects were 25 meters in length, with a <br />sample data point collected at 0.5 meter intervals along the transect. In Areas 1 and 2 <br />transects were 50 meters in length, with a sample data point collected at 1.0 meter <br />intervals along the transect. Transect direction was established randomly. <br />