My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL32807
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL32807
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:55:08 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:26:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981033
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
12/19/1997
Doc Name
BEAR COAL CO
From
BEAR COAL CO
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ivlr. David Berry <br />Senior Environmental Protection Specialist <br />December 19, 1997 <br />Page 2 <br />Beaz - No water quality impacts to the North Fork have been evaluated for this dischazge. <br />A sample was taken on December 9, 1997 for chemical monitoring. During the month of <br />December the water will undergo a WET test. <br />4. Please summarize the Bear Mine's experience with subsurface coal bums and elevated <br />carbon monoxide, from when mining began to the present. Has it been necessary to shut <br />doom mining operations due to elevated carbon monoxide levels? If yes, please provide <br />details. To your knowledge, where are there coal bums in and adjacent to the Bear Mine? <br />Bear -Elevated levels of carbon monoxide have caused mining to cease at times. There <br />was carbon monoxide behind C-Seam seals which was controlled so mining could <br />continue. The source of the carbon monoxide was not determined. Other than the "hot <br />spots" discussed in number 20 below, Bear has not found evidence of coal bums in and <br />adjacent to the Bear Mine. <br />5. Please describe your excavation activities along the toe of the landslide. By "excavation" <br />we refer not only to the removal of natural material but also to the removal of coal that <br />may have been piled along the toe of the slope. <br />Bear -Reclamation activities along the toe of the slope have only involved the removal of <br />coal. <br />6. Please describe the history of slope instability a[ the Beaz Mine in the general vicinity of <br />your mine during your years of operation. Note that the current landslide encompasses <br />three raveling slopes (that are influenced by undermining due to erosion by the North <br />Fork) and two upper landslides. All of these features are readily appazent in the field and <br />via inspection of aerial photographs. What are your observations of how these five <br />features have changed over time? <br />Bear -Available information related to slope stability is included in the reports by Rocky <br />Mountain Geotechnical Inc. dated August 25, 1981(File #I), April 16, 1982 (File #2), <br />Apri130 , 1986 (File #3), and May 23, 1986 (File #4), and Exhibit 21 (File #5) and <br />Exhibit 22 (File #6) of the Beaz mine permit. <br />7. MCC would appreciate the opportunity to review engineering and geologic studies which <br />the Bear Mine has conducted that focus on how Bear B-Seam and C-Seam mining has <br />impacted Slope stability. <br />Bear -See Rocky Mountain Geotechnical, Inc. report dated May 23, 1986 titled <br />Interaction of Subsidence and Landsliding, Beaz No. 3 Mine (File #4). Exhibit 21 of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.