Laserfiche WebLink
Existing Data and Literature Review <br />A files search conducted through the Office of Archaeology and Historic <br />Preservation in Denver revealed the Following information. Several previous <br />cultural resource inventories have been completed within and adjacent to the <br />present study area. Recently, MAC completed cultural resource surveys for <br />several water monitoring locations and core holes for Peabody. No cultural <br />resources were discovered on these small scale projects (Rood 1990a, 1990b). <br />O'Neil (1989) and Harrison (1990) both completed archaeological surveys for well <br />pads near the project area. Neither study produced cultural sites. <br />In 1989, MAC completed test excavations at 5RT132 which is within the <br />Seneca II mine plan area. This site was not considered to be eligible for <br />nomination to the NRHP (Metcalf 1989). Site 5RT132 did produce a single <br />radiocarbon date of 1590 + 80 which suggests an early Late Prehistoric occupation <br />for the site. This early Late Prehistoric date is consistent with findings from <br />nearby areas (LaPoint 1987). <br />In 1980, Western Cultural Resource Management (WCRM) completed a Class III <br />survey of over 4,300 acres for the Seneca II-W mine. Fifteen cultural resources <br />were recorded and 5RT132, discussed above, was considered to be the only <br />significant resource (Wheeler 1980). Other cultural resource surveys in the <br />project vicinity include work by Johnson (1981) for the Yoast Coal lease; a <br />seismic line (Avazian 1985); a well location (Metcalf 1985); and several drill <br />holes for Freeman Cosl (Kranzush 1979; 1982). All of these above mentioned <br />projects, with the exception of the Yoast Project, were negative in terms of <br />cultural resources: Johnson (1981) recorded only four sites and four IFs in over <br />1400 acres of surveyed ground. <br />The culture history of the project area is presented in Guthrie et al. <br />(1984), Grady (1984), Mehls (1984) and Husband (1984). Overall there is a low <br />site .density of prehistoric locations in this area. Topographically, the area <br />is very steep and generally, visibility is low throughout the project area. <br />One previously recorded site, 5RT118 is within the Seneca II-W expansion <br />area. .-This site was originally recorded in 1979 and consists of three <br />anthropomorphic pictographs on a cliff face. These figures are round headed with <br />square shoulders and the legs consist of continuations of the body lines. They <br />are approximately four feet tall and are rendered in red paint. One of the <br />figures consists of only the head with the remainder lost due to a small. <br />5RT118 is within the expansion area and may be impacted by the project. <br />Testing recommendations are presented in a later section of this report. <br />Statement of Objectives <br />Previous work in the vicinity of the project area has demonstrated an <br />overall low density of cultural resources. It is unknown if the paucity of <br />cultural sites is due to poor visibility, steep terrain, or simply a general lack <br />of sites. All three factors probably pertain to this area. <br />In spite of the established low density of cultural resources, rock art <br />(Johnson 1981; 5RT118) and lithic scatters are known to exist in the project <br />