My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL32494
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL32494
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:55:01 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:19:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1973021
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Name
MORRISON QUARRY OF COOLEY GRAVEL CO AND THE ENVIRONMENT IN TWO PARTS PART 1A REVIEW OF THE 1972
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7 <br /> <br />1 <br />t 5. Slope the operating area so that all water that enters it <br /> will flow to the drop-in. <br /> 6. Build a good berm all the way across the downstream edge of <br />' the fill. Be sure the fill slopes from the berm back to the <br /> drop-in. <br />' 7. Stabilize the berm and the edge of the fill as rapidly as <br /> possible. <br />' Actions <br /> The Company installed a 72-inch diameter concrete pipe in 1972 through <br /> about the lower 1/3 of the operations area. It was large enough to carry <br />' more than the 100-year flood. Leading into it, however, through the middle <br /> 1/3 of the area, only a 24-inch pipe was installed. That pipe was adequate <br /> for all normal flows but it was inadequate for major floods. An open <br />' channel was maintained through the upper 1/3 of the area. <br /> In 1974 the Company retained the firm of Leonard Rice, Consulting Water <br /> Engineers, to design a drainage system for the quarry that will accommodate <br />' the 100-year flood and local storm run-off. A 66-inch pipe has now been <br /> laid through the upper 2/3 of the operations area and a flood catchment <br />' and stilling basin is being prepared in the upper 1/3. (See report of <br />Leonard Rice Consulting Engineers, dated April, 1975). The lower quarry <br /> has been sloped to drain over the face of the fill through a heavily rocked <br /> channel. <br />1 <br /> Steps have been taken to stabilize the face of the hill (See subheading <br /> "Rehabilitation"). <br />' We have one additional recommendation that dates back to 1973 on which <br /> no action has been taken. Quite a large amount of soil and rock has been <br />' pushed into the drainage channel that enters the quarry from the northwest. <br />Heavy runoff from the watershed could cause a mudflow into the quarry. <br /> As the site in question will became part of the quarry later, this has <br /> little ecological significance. It could cause inconvenience and expense <br />' in operating the quarry. <br /> Vegetation and Wildlife <br />t Little can be done for the vegetation and wildlife that occupied the <br />quarry area. Revegetation of disturbed areas will be covered under the <br />heading, "Rehabilitation." <br />' Scenics <br />' Recommendations <br />Recommendations were made to minimize the detrimental impact on esthetics <br />' of the eight scenic detractants that were identified. Recommendations <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.