My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL32420
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL32420
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:54:59 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:18:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/28/1990
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance for PR1
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />The proposed Ciruela Canyon refuse pile at the Golden Eagle Mine is less <br />than one-third the size of the refuse piles in the alluvial plain at <br />New Elk Mines. Seepage from these piles is anticipated to result in a <br />negligible increase in TDS values fora Middle Purgatoire Q7-10 low flow <br />such an increase in TDS is less than 15% of that occurring in the <br />Purgatoire River at Golden Eagle. Precipitation and infiltration values <br />should be similar for these adjacent mines. Consequently the <br />Ciruela Canyon refuse area has little potential to raise TDS or SAR <br />values in the Purgatoire River nearby. <br />Following mining, mine water would no longer be discharged to the river. <br />Only seepage from the coal refuse piles would potentially continue to <br />affect water quality in the stream-alluvial aquifer system. Continued <br />seepage from the New Elk and Golden Eagle piles would, however, not add <br />significantly to either TDS or SAR values of the Purgatoire River. <br />As required by Rule 2.07.6(2)(c), the Division has assessed the probable <br />cu milative impacts of all anticipated coal mining in the general area on <br />the hydrologic balance. These impacts cannot include those that result <br />from secondary or retreat mining under Wet Canyon, since adequate data <br />for such evaluation has not been supplied by the operator. As a result, <br />secondary or retreat mining under Wet Canyon cannot be approved at this <br />time. Excluding that aspect of the proposed operation, the Division <br />finds that the operations described in the application have been designed <br />to prevent damage to the hydrologic balance outside the proposed permit <br />area. <br />HYDROLOGIC MONITORING <br />The permittee is required under Rule 4.05.13.(1) and (2) to monitor the <br />effects of underground mining activities upon the quantity and quality of <br />ground water and surface water. This monitoring is required in order to <br />judge the compliance of the operator with the water quality provisions of <br />the Colorado Surface Coal Mining Reclamation Act. The water quality <br />provisions of the Act require that the operator shall in no case violate <br />Federal and State water quality statutes, regulations, standards, or <br />effluent limitations. As a matter of policy, the Division has adopted <br />the Department of Health's Receiving Stream Standards as one of the <br />standards by which impacts to the hydrologic balance from mining are <br />judged. Other standards are developed and used by the Division when <br />appropriate. Receiving stream standards have been established for the <br />Purgatoire River. The applicant mrst also demonstrate an ability to <br />comply with the NPDES effluent limitations. <br />Rule 4.05.13(1) and (2) do not apply strictly to point discharges as does <br />the NPDES permit issued by the Colorado Health Department. The rules in <br />4.05.13(1) require monitoring of nonpoint discharges and ground water. <br />-25- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.