My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL32227
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL32227
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:54:54 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:14:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999002
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
7/22/1999
Doc Name
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT VOL 1 CHAPTER 1 AND 2
From
BLM
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CHAPTERTWO agency Preferred fiiternatlue <br />regazding potential impacts. It addresses mitigations for mule deer, sage ~~ouse, migratory • <br />birds, and raptors. <br />2.1 PROJECT MODIFICATIONS <br />In response to public and agency comments on the Draft EIS and other permit reviews, American <br />Soda commits to the following modifications to the Yankee Gulch Project. <br />Piceance Site <br />• The proposed cooling tower at the Piceance Site, identified in Section 2.2..1.2 of the Draft <br />EIS, has been eliminated and replaced by an air~ooled unit with no discharge to the <br />evaporation pond or the atmosphere. <br />• A 1-acre stormwater retention pond has been added to the Piceance Site ~idjacent to the <br />Piceance evaporation pond, as shown in Figure 2-2 (modified). The total disturbance azea for <br />the stormwater retention pond would be approximately 1.6 acres. The pond was designed to <br />contain the 100-yeaz, 24-hour precipitation event, plus an additional 50 percent of the <br />precipitation event, plus the volume of the largest on-site storage container. Stormwater <br />runoff from the initial processing facility would be routed to the retention pond. Solids <br />would be allowed to settle in the retention pond and decant water would be discharged upon <br />visual inspection into intermittent channels tributary to Piceance Creek. The pond would <br />also be equipped with pumps capable of purging the pond and storing thf: water in on-site <br />tanks, if necessary. <br />The layouts of the initial processing facility and evaporation pond in Figure 2-2 (modified) <br />have been updated since the Draft EIS. The proposed sizes of the facilit;+ and pond have not <br />changed, but the layouts shown in the modified figure aze more represen~~ative of these <br />features to scale. <br />The Yellow Creek Jeep Trail (Rio Blanco County Road 83) would not lx; realigned as shown <br />on Figure 2-2 in the Draft EIS, but would be upgraded in its present location. Based on <br />discussions among American Soda, Rio Blanco County Road and Brdgc: Departrnent, and <br />the BLM, the Yellow Creek Jeep Trail would remain a county road as it is currently aligned. <br />Refer to Figure 2-2 (modified). Rio Blanco County requires, as a condition of approval for <br />its Major Development Permit, that American Soda assume responsibility for all construction <br />and maintenance costs for the road during construction and commercial operation of the mine <br />for portions of the road to be used by the project. The mad would be widened and graveled <br />in the vicinity of the initial processing facility. The road is currently aone-lane, 12-foot-wide <br />dirt road, and it would be widened to two 12-foot-wide lanes. The Rio Etlanco Road and <br />Bridge Department and the BLM would oversee the design and construction of the road <br />improvement. The initial widening would occur approximately 0.5 mile on either side of the <br />proposed initial processing facility. In future years, as mining activities progress northwazd in <br />the mine panels, the road would be widened and graveled to access each subsequent mine <br />panel. The total length of road to be upgraded is approximately 1.9 miler. The total proposed <br />long-term disturbance due to the road upgrade is approximately 3.7 acres compared to an <br />estimated 5.2 acres for the 6,200 feet (1.2 miles) of trail realignment described in the Draft <br />2-2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.