Laserfiche WebLink
CHAPTERTWO Agency Preferred Altematnre <br />ARer review of environmental information and discussions and communications with agencies <br />and the public, an Agency Preferred Alternative has been developed that best responds to <br />concerns and issues and m;n;m;~>s environmental impacts. This alternative is similaz to the <br />Proposed Action and accomplishes the goal of mining sodium products, but it imposes additional <br />agency-required mitigation and includes several mitigation/monitoring plans not included in the <br />Draft EIS. Although these elements would have been required before approval to proceed with <br />construction was issued by the BLM, it was decided that such modifications and mitigation plans <br />would be incorporated into the EIS process to fully define project requirements and to analyze <br />potential effects of the proposed project in light of the required mitigation/monitoringphns. <br />The Agency Preferred Alternative is distinguished from the Proposed Action by incorporating <br />five mitigation/monitoring plans, some modifications to the project, and additional mitigation <br />measures. Each of these elements is described in this section, and is considered in the analysis of <br />the environmental consequences of the Agency Preferred Alternative in Chapter 3.0. The <br />following five plans aze included as appendices to this Final EIS. Section 2.3 provides a more <br />detailed description of the major components of the plans. <br />• Pipeline Plan of Development. This plan, found in Appendix E, presents a detailed <br />description of the pipeline facilities and construction and operation methods, based on <br />pipeline design by The Williams Companies, a project partner with American Soda. It <br />includes reclamation and sediment control procedures for the pipeline, and a spill <br />contingency plan, <br />• Subsidence Monitoring Plan. This plan, found in Appendix F, includes both surface and <br />subsurface monitoring of potential vertical ground movement at the Yankee Gulch Project. <br />Subsidence monitoring would be performed throughout the wmmercial operating life of the <br />project and results would be checked periodically, as needed, to verify and calibrate <br />numerical models used in the design of the well field layout. <br />• Groundwater and Surface Water Monitoring Plan. This monitoring plan, found in <br />Appendix G, includes groundwater and surface water monitoring for the Yankee Gulch Lease <br />site (solution well field and the upper plant) and the Pazachute Creek site (lower plant) for the <br />first phase (0-5 years) of commercial operations. The objective of the Groundwater and <br />Surface Water Monitoring Plan is to supplement existing baseline data and to establish trends <br />in water quality and flow such that any deviation from the established characteristics is <br />recognizable. This would be accomplished by monitoring a network of groundwater <br />monitoring wells, surface water monitoring stations, and production facilities. <br /> <br />Soil Conservation, Erosion and Sediment Control, Reclamation, and Revegetatton Plan <br />(Reclamation Plan). The Reclamation Plan, found in Appendix H, is a revised and expanded <br />version of the Proposed Erosion Control, Reclamation, and Revegetation Procedures <br />included as Appendix A of the Draft EIS. It addresses soil salvage, erosion control, <br />revegetation, and success criteria for reclamation of well fields, surface facilities, and access <br />roads. <br />• Wildlife Mitigation Plan. This plan, found in Appendix I, was prepazed by American Soda in <br />consultation with the CDOW and BLM, in response to lease stipulations and concerns <br />2-1 <br />