My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL31538
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL31538
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:54:37 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 7:01:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
5/12/2003
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance for PR7
From
Construct B-Seam Portals, Facility Benches, & Associated Structures
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
period, since it did not alter normal water flow, contribute sediment, or <br />adversely affect fish or wildlife (4.03.1(2)(c)). <br />The Division does not propose to approve haul road cut slopes steeper <br />than 1.SH:1 V in unconsolidated materials or 0.25H:1 V in rock <br />(4.03.1(3xc)(i)). <br />B. Access Roads <br />One access road was built to provide access from the portal bench to the utility <br />bench above the portal bench. Several short length access roads were built that <br />lead from the main paved haul road to important points along the utility corridor, <br />for access to the conveyor line, water line and high voltage power line. There is <br />also an access road south of the unit train loadout. <br />Alternative criteria and specifications were not used during the design of <br />access roads (4.03.2(1)(e)). <br />2. The landowner has not requested the retention of the access road depicted <br />on Map Nos. 15-1 and I S-2. Therefore, the access road will be reclaimed <br />(4.03.2(1)(f)). <br />3. The Division does not propose to approve the location of a portion of an <br />access road in the channel of a stream (4.03.2(2)(b)). <br />4. The Division does not propose to approve access road cut slopes steeper <br />than 1.SH: ] V or 0.25H:1 V (4.03.2(3)(c)(i)). <br />5. The Division does not propose to approve an access road embankment <br />slope steeper than 1.35H: TV (4.03.2(3)(d)(viii)). <br />C. Light-Use Roads <br />The Division does not propose to approve the location of a portion of a <br />light-use road in the channel of an ephemeral stream with an upstream <br />watershed of at least one (1) squaze mile, an intermittent or a perennial <br />stream (4.03.3(2)(b)). <br />2. The Division does not propose to approve a ford of an intermittent, a <br />perennial or an ephemeral stream, which drains at least one (1) square <br />mile. Fords will be allowed across ephemeral streams with a watershed <br />less than one (1) squaze mile. The Division finds that the fords will not <br />affect stream sedimentation or fish, wildlife, and related values due to <br />light and infrequent use. <br />26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.