Laserfiche WebLink
Nine wells are used to monitor alluvial water quality in the drainages. Two wells <br />aze located along Cow Camp Creek, one along Bond Creek, two along Grassy Creek <br />and four along Little Grassy Creek. All of these wells exhibit seasonal variations. <br />The Grassy Creek alluvial system is down gradient of mining and the wells were <br />constructed after mining in the Grassy Creek drainage. Progressing downstream, the <br />little Grassy Creek alluvial aquifer becomes increasingly affected by spoils water <br />discharge. <br />Spoils <br />The resaturation of portions of the backfilled pits has been expressed as spoil <br />aquifers. Water percolates through the replaced spoil material and flows <br />down-gradient until it reaches the lower-most highwall where the infiltration rate <br />into bedrock is much lower than flow through the spoil. When the elevation head of <br />the spoil aquifer exceeds the ground surface elevation, the spoil water discharges in <br />the form of springs at the topographically lowest point along the reclaimed highwall. <br />Nine spoil springs have been identified, eight of which are monitored by Seneca <br />Coal Company. in addition, Seneca Coal Company has historically monitored <br />thirteen spoil wells as part of the approved monitoring plan. <br />Water from the spoils exhibit elevated concentrations of sulfate, manganese, and <br />magnesium. TDS concentrations in water from spoil wells have generally risen <br />during the period of monitoring but seem to level out at about 4000 mg/1. Several <br />exceptions are S25-S, which has reached concentrations as high as 5700 mg/1, S26-S <br />which reached levels as high as 4300 mg/1 but has dropped off to around 3500 mg/l, <br />and S27-S which has climbed gradually to about 3300 mg/I TDS. Spoil springs <br />show the same range of concentrations as the wells. <br />In 1977, the Water Resources Division of the United States Geological Survey <br />(USGS) began a lysimeter study at the Seneca II Mine to determine spoil aquifer <br />dischazge quality, and how that quality changes over time. Stipulation No. 23 in the <br />original permit required the applicant to submit the USGS report to the Division <br />upon its completion. In 1994, the USGS published Water-Resources Investigations <br />Report 92-4187 titled, Hydrolosv and Geochemistry of a Surface Coal Mine in <br />Northwestern Colorado. The report describes the sources of hydrologic recharge to <br />and from reclaimed spoil, the relative contributions of recharge to the reclaimed <br />spoil aquifer from identified source waters, and the water movement and <br />geochemical reactions that control water quality in reclaimed spoil. <br />23 <br />