My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1982-04-21_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1981302
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M1981302
>
1982-04-21_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1981302
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/9/2022 2:40:21 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 6:58:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981302
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
4/21/1982
Doc Name
Ground water issues
From
DWR
To
MLR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Brad James, • • <br /> April 19, 1982 <br /> Page Two <br /> 3. Reclamation - As stated under item #1, Flatiron has the <br /> opportunity to complete mining and reclamation of the entire <br /> property without interruption by applying for and receiving <br /> further approval to mine the remainder of the property prior <br /> to completion of stage 2. As with any other mining permit <br /> before the MLRB, however, the reclamation plan and bonding <br /> should allow for the reclamation of only those areas mined <br /> if mining of the entire property is not completed. <br /> 7. Alternate Reclamation Plan to Meet Boulder County Permitting <br /> Process - If the MLRB permitting process can be used to <br /> co— nndition the application for future review and implementa- <br /> tion of an alternate reclamation plan "in the event that <br /> Boulder County ultimately limits excavation to these two <br /> stages" , the Boulder County Planning staff would have no . <br /> problem with such a condition. If, however, the MLRB would <br /> be unable to enforce such a condition, the staff would <br /> prefer that the MLRB acquire an alternate reclamation plan <br /> for only the first two stages. <br /> The staff is essentially in agreement with the remainder of the statements <br /> expressed in Mrs. Winter's letter of April 9. It is hoped that this letter <br /> and the attached letter will be helpful to the MLRB and staff in reviewing <br /> the Deepe Farm Pit. If you should have any questions or require additional <br /> information, please feel free to contact me at the Planning Office. <br /> Very truly yours , <br /> II <br /> GarGoodell , <br /> Operational Planner <br /> GRG/cld <br /> Encl. <br /> cc: Mrs. Margaret Winter <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.